Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 79 (1.28 seconds)

Shri Dani Belo vs The State Of Arunachal Pradesh & Ors on 20 April, 2011

The case of Manoharan (supra) reiterates the settled proposition of law that vacancies, existing prior to formal amendment to the recruitment rules, are to be filled up according to rules applicable prior to amendment. In the present case, the order, regularizing the ad hoc appointment of respondent No. 4, is even de hors the 1979 Rules inasmuch as this direct recruitment was made without following any selection process whatsoever.
Gauhati High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Ishwar Dass Sharma vs State Of H.P. & Another on 16 October, 2020

In making the afore submission, the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, depends upon paragraph 20 to 25, of, the Judgment, rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court, in (2008) 3 Supreme Court Cases 641, titled as, "A. Manoharan and others versus Union of India 3 ::: Downloaded on - 17/10/2020 20:18:23 :::HCHP 4 and others", paragraphs whereof, are extracted hereinafter:
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 3 - S Thakur - Full Document

Lubna Fatima vs Union Of India on 25 November, 2021

In the case of A. Manoharan and others vs. Union of India and others [(2008) 3 SCC 641] while interpreting the powers of the Central Government to give directions to the Major Trust under Sub-section (1) of Section 111 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, which provided that the authority in discharge of its functions under the Act be bound by such directions on questions of policy as the Central Government may give in writing from time to time, it was held and observed as under:
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sachin Kaswan vs Union Of India on 25 November, 2021

In the case of A. Manoharan and others vs. Union of India and others [(2008) 3 SCC 641] while interpreting the powers of the Central Government to give directions to the Major Trust under Sub-section (1) of Section 111 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, which provided that the authority in discharge of its functions under the Act be bound by such directions on questions of policy as the Central Government may give in writing from time to time, it was held and observed as under:
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Devesh Sharma vs Union Of India on 25 November, 2021

In the case of A. Manoharan and others vs. Union of India and others [(2008) 3 SCC 641] while interpreting the powers of the Central Government to give directions to the Major Trust under Sub-section (1) of Section 111 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, which provided that the authority in discharge of its functions under the Act be bound by such directions on questions of policy as the Central Government may give in writing from time to time, it was held and observed as under:
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Prakash Chandra Khatik vs State Of Rajasthan on 25 November, 2021

In the case of A. Manoharan and others vs. Union of India and others [(2008) 3 SCC 641] while interpreting the powers of the Central Government to give directions to the Major Trust under Sub-section (1) of Section 111 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, which provided that the authority in discharge of its functions under the Act be bound by such directions on questions of policy as the Central Government may give in writing from time to time, it was held and observed as under:
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anita Bankawat vs State Of Rajasthan on 25 November, 2021

In the case of A. Manoharan and others vs. Union of India and others [(2008) 3 SCC 641] while interpreting the powers of the Central Government to give directions to the Major Trust under Sub-section (1) of Section 111 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, which provided that the authority in discharge of its functions under the Act be bound by such directions on questions of policy as the Central Government may give in writing from time to time, it was held and observed as under:
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 39 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next