Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.44 seconds)
Documents citing Reliance Trading Corporation vs Ito on 25 September, 2001

The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S. India Cements Ltd

(ii) IPCA Laboratory Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax [reported in (2004) 135 taxmann 594 (SC)], (iii) CIT, Thiruvananthapuram Vs. K.Ravindranathan Nair [reported in (2007) 165 taxmann 282 (SC)]; (iv) Liberty India Vs. CIT [(2009) 183 taxman 349 (SC)]; and (v) Reliance Trading Corporation Vs. ITO [reported in (2015) 61 Taxmann.com 267 (Rajasthan) (FB)]. 11/21 http://www.judis.nic.in Tax Case Appeal No. 117 of 2009 19.
Madras High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - T S Sivagnanam - Full Document

Shri Kaushal Kishore Agarwal vs The Income Tax Officer And Ors on 9 November, 2016

5. Counsel for the respondents contended that there is concurrent finding and in view of decision of this Court in case of CIT & Ors. vs. Vimal Chand Surana & Ors. decided on 11/9/2015 and another decision in case of Reliance Trading Corporation & Ors. vs. The ITO, Jaipur & Ors. decided on 1/5/2015, the order of the Tribunal is required to be confirmed.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - K Jhaveri - Full Document

Acit, Jaipur vs Vartika Girdhani, Jaipur on 10 November, 2016

We also find that the issue is squarely covered by the decisions of the Coordinate Bench rendered in the cases of Ashok Parnami vs. Additional CIT in ITA No. 777/JP/2013 dated 29.01.2016 and M/s. Cosmopolitan Trading Corporation vs. ITO in ITA No. 298/JP/2013 dated 17.07.2015. Therefore, respectfully following the order of coordinate Bench in ITA No. 777/JP/2013 dated 29.01.2016 for A.Y. 2009-10 and in ITA No. 298/JP/2013 dated 17.07.2015 for A.Y. 2005-06, we affirm the order of ld. CIT (A) and the ground of the revenue is hereby rejected.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1