Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (2.11 seconds)
Documents citing G Radhakrishnan, Sivakasi vs Dcit Tds Circle 1, Madurai on 30 July, 2018

Shri. Nr Rajasekharan, Sivakasi vs Ito Tds Ward , Madurai on 29 October, 2018

5. We have heard the ld. DR, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. We have also gone through the case law referred to in the additional written submission of the assessee and find that the issue involved in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee. While adjudicating identical issue on similar facts and circumstances, in the case of G. Radhakrishnan v. DCIT in I.T.A. No. 526/Chny/2018 dated 30.07.2018 for the assessment year 2013-14, the Coordinate Benches of the Tribunal, has observed and held as under:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chennai Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Spk Chinnakani Nadar & Co, Sivakasi vs Ito Tds Ward, Madurai on 29 October, 2018

the case law referred to in the additional written submission of the assessee and find that the issue involved in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee. While adjudicating identical issue on similar facts and circumstances, in the case of G. Radhakrishnan v. DCIT in I.T.A. No. 526/Chny/2018 dated 30.07.2018 for the assessment year 2013-14, the Coordinate Benches of the Tribunal, has observed and held as under:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chennai Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gupta Printers, Sivakasi vs Dcit Tds Circle, Madurai on 29 October, 2018

5. We have heard the ld. DR, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. We have also gone through the case law referred to in the additional written submission of the assessee and find that the issue involved in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee. While adjudicating identical issue on similar facts and circumstances, in the case of G. Radhakrishnan v. DCIT in I.T.A. No. 526/Chny/2018 dated 30.07.2018 for the assessment year 2013-14, the Coordinate Benches of the Tribunal, has observed and held as under:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chennai Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Lotus Scores And Screens, Sivakasi vs Ito Tds Ward, Madurai on 20 November, 2018

5. We have heard the ld. DR, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. We have also gone through the case law referred to in the additional written submission of the assessee and find that the issue involved in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee. While adjudicating identical issue on similar facts and circumstances, in the case of G. Radhakrishnan v. DCIT in I.T.A. No. 526/Chny/2018 dated 30.07.2018 for the assessment year 2013-14, the Coordinate Benches of the Tribunal, has observed and held as under:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chennai Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vijay Traders, Sivakasi vs Ito Tds Ward, Madurai on 20 November, 2018

5. We have heard the ld. DR, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. We have also gone through the case law referred to in the additional written submission of the assessee and find that the issue involved in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee. While adjudicating identical issue on similar facts and circumstances, in the case of G. Radhakrishnan v. DCIT in I.T.A. No. 526/Chny/2018 dated 30.07.2018 for the assessment year 2013-14, the Coordinate Benches of the Tribunal, has observed and held as under:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chennai Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next