Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 172 (1.51 seconds)
Documents citing The Land Acquisition Officer vs Shivabai & Ors on 4 April, 1997

Jaysukh Raghla Patel vs The Land Acquisition Officer on 17 August, 2012

Even in the case of Special Land Acquisition Officer Vs. Shivabai and others (supra), the issue which arises in the present appeal viz; the effect of immediately filing of an application for reference did not arise for consideration before the Apex Court. However, in the subsequent three decisions which we have referred above, the issue specifically arose before the Apex Court which has been answered by holding that even the fact that reference application is filed within limitation is sufficient to prove that the Award under section 11 has not been accepted.
Bombay High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 1 - A Oka - Full Document

Gebi Bapuji Banjari (Yerwal) vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr. on 6 December, 2005

14. The learned Counsel for the review-petitioner states that this judgment cannot be an authority for the proposition that protest is necessary, since it is on the question of limitation for making a reference. True it is, that the question involved in the case of Land Acquisition Officer v. Shivabai and Ors. was also one of limitation. In fact, no authorities are required for the proposition that mandate of second proviso to Sub-section (2) of Section 31 of the Land Acquisition Act should be followed. The authorities relied on by the learned AGP for the respondents only reinforce the submission that there has been no dilution of that requirement of protest by any pronouncement of the Apex Court.
Bombay High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 132 - R C Chavan - Full Document

Gopi Assari vs Special Tahsildar (La) on 5 August, 2009

After surveying the case law on the point including the judgment of the Supreme Court in L.A. Officer v. Shivabai (1997)9 SCC 710) the Division Bench held in that case where the compensation amount was received under protest and a letter was written by the petitioner readily seeking enhancement of compensation in tune with market value of the land under acquisition that the letter can be construed as an application for reference even though the same never contained a prayer to make a reference to the court in coming to such a conclusion.
Kerala High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 4 - P C Kuriakose - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next