Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.23 seconds)
Documents citing Karnataka Handloom Development ... vs Sh. B.S. Chopra on 18 August, 1999

Sh. Sanjay Kumar And Anr. vs Smt. Sita Rani Khanna And Ors. on 18 September, 2007

In a case where no steps were taken for restoration for over six months and the proceedings had been pending for more than three years it was held that on account of negligence of the counsel, the defendant should not be completely barred and another chance was given for setting aside the ex-parte proceedings subject to payment of the cost in Karnataka Handloom Development Corporation Ltd. (Supra) by a Single Judge of this Court.
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 22 - A Kumar - Full Document

Jagtar Singh vs Jaswinder Singh And Ors on 20 July, 2015

Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently contended that the approach of the trial Court for setting aside the ex parte proceedings against the defendants under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC should be liberal. He has relied upon Kuldip Kaur Vs. Gurdeep Singh, 1993 (2) PLR 703 and Karnataka Handloom Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. B.S. Chopra, 1999(3) PLR (Delhi) 44 wherein the application filed after three years of passing of ex parte order had been allowed and Ramhet and others Vs. Ajaypal Singh and others, 2003 (2) RCR (Civil) 322 to contend that the application under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC filed by the defendants should be liberally allowed by the Courts.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M M Bedi - Full Document
1