Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 255 (1.11 seconds)
Documents citing Spl.Land Acquisition Officer vs Karigowda & Ors on 26 April, 2010

Smt.Ramibai vs Chief Executive Officer on 10 July, 2017

[8] For the purpose of calculation of compensation and to arrive fair market value of agricultural land various facts and circumstances of the case are liable to be consider by the court. The Courts have been exercised their discretion by adopting different methods; like (a) Sales statistics method; (b) Capitalisation of net income method; and (c) Agricultural yield basis method. The Supreme Court in the case of Special Land Acquisition Officer v/s Karigowda [(2010) 5 SCC 708] has held as under :-
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

K.B.Mahesh vs The Special Tahsildar (La) on 28 March, 2025

In the case of Special Land Acquisition Officer v. Karigowda [AIR 2010 SC 2322], upon which much reliance was placed by the learned counsel for the claimants, the Honourable Supreme Court has held that sale instances of adjacent villages can be made the basis for determining the fair market value and the power of compulsive acquisition has an inbuilt element of duty and responsibility upon the State to pay the compensation which is just, fair and without delay. Thus, it will be appropriate to apply the rule of plain interpretation to the provisions of this Act. The relevant paragraph of the above said judgement reads as follows:
Madras High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - N S Kumar - Full Document

Dewas Devlopment Authority vs Tarachand And Others on 11 October, 2018

10. For the purpose of calculation of compensation and to arrive fair market value of agricultural land various facts and circumstances of the case are liable to be consider by the court. The Court must exercise its discretion by adopting different methods; like (a) Sales statistics method; (b) Capitalisation of net income method; and (c) Agricultural yield basis method. The Supreme Court in the case of Special Land Acquisition Officer v/s Karigowda : (2010) 5 SCC 708 has held as under :-
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K.B.Mahesh vs The Special Tahsildar (La) on 28 March, 2025

In the case of Special Land Acquisition Officer v. Karigowda [AIR 2010 SC 2322], upon which much reliance was placed by the learned counsel for the claimants, the Honourable Supreme Court has held that sale instances of adjacent villages can be made the basis for determining the fair market value and the power of compulsive acquisition has an inbuilt element of duty and responsibility upon the State to pay the compensation which is just, fair and without delay. Thus, it will be appropriate to apply the rule of plain interpretation to the provisions of this Act. The relevant paragraph of the above said judgement reads as follows:
Madras High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - N S Kumar - Full Document

K.B.Mahesh vs The Special Tahsildar (La) on 28 March, 2025

In the case of Special Land Acquisition Officer v. Karigowda [AIR 2010 SC 2322], upon which much reliance was placed by the learned counsel for the claimants, the Honourable Supreme Court has held that sale instances of adjacent villages can be made the basis for determining the fair market value and the power of compulsive acquisition has an inbuilt element of duty and responsibility upon the State to pay the compensation which is just, fair and without delay. Thus, it will be appropriate to apply the rule of plain interpretation to the provisions of this Act. The relevant paragraph of the above said judgement reads as follows:
Madras High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - N S Kumar - Full Document

The State Of Mp vs Rameshchand on 14 August, 2018

15. For the purpose of calculation of compensation and to arrive fair market value of agricultural land various facts and circumstances of the case are liable to be consider by the court. The Court must exercise its discretion by adopting different methods; like (a) Sales statistics method; (b) Capitalisation of net income method; and (c) Agricultural yield basis method. The Supreme Court in the case of Special Land Acquisition Officer v/s Karigowda : (2010) 5 SCC 708 has held as under :-
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Deceased Smt. Jhaggabai Thru. Lrs. ... on 27 August, 2019

5. For the purpose of calculation of compensation and to arrive fair market value of agricultural land various facts and circumstances of the case are liable to be consider by the court. The Court must exercise its discretion by adopting different methods; like (a) Sales statistics method; (b) Capitalisation of net income method; and (c) Agricultural yield basis method as held by the Supreme Court in the case of Special Land Acquisition Officer v/s Karigowda : (2010) 5 SCC 708.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Balu on 11 February, 2019

5. For the purpose of calculation of compensation and to arrive fair market value of agricultural land various facts and circumstances of the case are liable to be consider by the court. The Court must exercise its discretion by adopting different methods; like (a) Sales statistics method; (b) Capitalisation of net income method; and (c) Agricultural yield basis method as held by the Supreme Court in the case of Special Land Acquisition Officer v/s Karigowda : (2010) 5 SCC 708.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next