Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.33 seconds)
Documents citing Vatika Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs Vatika Grand on 5 March, 2009

Itc Limited vs Maurya Hotel (Madra) Pvt Ltd on 22 July, 2021

The learned Senior Counsel would also draw my attention to the judgment of the Division Bench of Delhi High Court in Usha International Vs. Usha Television reported in 2002 SCC Online Delhi 306 and the judgment of the Single Judge of the Delhi High Court in Vatika Resorts Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Vatika Grand reported in 2009 (109) DRJ 607. Certain other decisions were also cited by the learned Senior Counsel covering the aspects of delay in seeking amendment and limitation.
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 2 - R Subramanian - Full Document

Dayal Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd & Anr. vs Dayal Agro Industries & Anr. on 10 April, 2023

In Vatika Resorts (supra), while allowing an amendment application so as to set up a case for infringement of the registered trademark of the plaintiff, the Court observed that an infringement action is based on substantially the same cause of action as that of passing off. Therefore, the said amendment will not change the nature of the suit. It was further observed that the Court shall not go into the merits of the amendment while deciding an amendment application
Delhi High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - A Bansal - Full Document

Vinay Aggarwal vs Rims Marketing Pvt. Ltd on 1 March, 2023

10. Counsel for the plaintiff has placed reliance on the judgment of the Coordinate Bench of this Court in Vatika Resorts Pvt. Ltd. v. Vatika Grand, 2009 SCC OnLine Del 498. In the aforesaid case also, the trademark VATIKA of the plaintiff was not registered on the date of filing of the suit and the said trademark was registered and assigned in favour of the plaintiff during the pendency of the suit.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A Bansal - Full Document
1