Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.41 seconds)
Documents citing Shri Rajendra Laxman Sakhare vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 11 January, 2013

Smt. Jyoti Janardhan Kale vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Police ... on 4 May, 2023

20. The next limb of prosecution evidence is of identification of assailants in prior TI Parade. In this regard, the prosecution has relied on the evidence of PW-10 Kambre (Special Judicial Magistrate) coupled with evidence of PW-4 Rahul who is Panch to the TI Parade. The defence has strongly criticized the evidence of prior TI Parade for non- compliance of procedural aspect and some other lapses. Mr. Ali the learned counsel by placing reliance on the decision of this Court in case of Dharmendra s/o. Laxman Sahare Vs. The State of Maharashtra, 2014 ALL MR (Cri) 3196 would submit that the TI Parade held in defective manner against guidelines cannot form the basis for conviction.
Bombay High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - V G Joshi - Full Document

Akash @ Bittu S/O. Jaikumar Sarjokar vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Police ... on 4 May, 2023

20. The next limb of prosecution evidence is of identification of assailants in prior TI Parade. In this regard, the prosecution has relied on the evidence of PW-10 Kambre (Special Judicial Magistrate) coupled with evidence of PW-4 Rahul who is Panch to the TI Parade. The defence has strongly criticized the evidence of prior TI Parade for non- compliance of procedural aspect and some other lapses. Mr. Ali the learned counsel by placing reliance on the decision of this Court in case of Dharmendra s/o. Laxman Sahare Vs. The State of Maharashtra, 2014 ALL MR (Cri) 3196 would submit that the TI Parade held in defective manner against guidelines cannot form the basis for conviction.
Bombay High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - V G Joshi - Full Document

Sandesh @ Golu S/O. Venu Naik vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O., P.S. ... on 4 May, 2023

20. The next limb of prosecution evidence is of identification of assailants in prior TI Parade. In this regard, the prosecution has relied on the evidence of PW-10 Kambre (Special Judicial Magistrate) coupled with evidence of PW-4 Rahul who is Panch to the TI Parade. The defence has strongly criticized the evidence of prior TI Parade for non- compliance of procedural aspect and some other lapses. Mr. Ali the learned counsel by placing reliance on the decision of this Court in case of Dharmendra s/o. Laxman Sahare Vs. The State of Maharashtra, 2014 ALL MR (Cri) 3196 would submit that the TI Parade held in defective manner against guidelines cannot form the basis for conviction.
Bombay High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - V G Joshi - Full Document

Shekhar S/O. Prakash Ambulkar (In Jail) vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Police ... on 4 May, 2023

20. The next limb of prosecution evidence is of identification of assailants in prior TI Parade. In this regard, the prosecution has relied on the evidence of PW-10 Kambre (Special Judicial Magistrate) coupled with evidence of PW-4 Rahul who is Panch to the TI Parade. The defence has strongly criticized the evidence of prior TI Parade for non- compliance of procedural aspect and some other lapses. Mr. Ali the learned counsel by placing reliance on the decision of this Court in case of Dharmendra s/o. Laxman Sahare Vs. The State of Maharashtra, 2014 ALL MR (Cri) 3196 would submit that the TI Parade held in defective manner against guidelines cannot form the basis for conviction.
Bombay High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - V G Joshi - Full Document

Kunal S/O. Bharat Goswami vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Police ... on 4 May, 2023

20. The next limb of prosecution evidence is of identification of assailants in prior TI Parade. In this regard, the prosecution has relied on the evidence of PW-10 Kambre (Special Judicial Magistrate) coupled with evidence of PW-4 Rahul who is Panch to the TI Parade. The defence has strongly criticized the evidence of prior TI Parade for non- compliance of procedural aspect and some other lapses. Mr. Ali the learned counsel by placing reliance on the decision of this Court in case of Dharmendra s/o. Laxman Sahare Vs. The State of Maharashtra, 2014 ALL MR (Cri) 3196 would submit that the TI Parade held in defective manner against guidelines cannot form the basis for conviction.
Bombay High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - V G Joshi - Full Document

Kamesh Ravindra Jambhulkar vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Police ... on 4 May, 2023

20. The next limb of prosecution evidence is of identification of assailants in prior TI Parade. In this regard, the prosecution has relied on the evidence of PW-10 Kambre (Special Judicial Magistrate) coupled with evidence of PW-4 Rahul who is Panch to the TI Parade. The defence has strongly criticized the evidence of prior TI Parade for non- compliance of procedural aspect and some other lapses. Mr. Ali the learned counsel by placing reliance on the decision of this Court in case of Dharmendra s/o. Laxman Sahare Vs. The State of Maharashtra, 2014 ALL MR (Cri) 3196 would submit that the TI Parade held in defective manner against guidelines cannot form the basis for conviction.
Bombay High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - V G Joshi - Full Document
1