Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.28 seconds)
Documents citing Cadbury India Limited vs Sm Dyechem Limited on 24 August, 1999

Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs The Wellcome Foundation Ltd. on 11 July, 2001

"Para 18 - We are unable to agree with the aforesaid observations in Dyechem's case (supra). As far as this Court is concerned, the decisions in the last four decades have clearly laid down that what has to be seen in the case of a passing off action is the similarity between the competing marks and to determine whether there is likelihood of deception or causing confusion.
Gujarat High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

Indchemie Health Specialties Pvt. Ltd vs Intas Pharmaceuticals And Anr on 24 June, 2015

In the case of Cadbury India Limited Vs. S M Dyechem Limited7, on the basis of the registration of the label mark 'PIKNIK', the plaintiff, manufacturing potato chips and wafers, was denied injunction against the defendant's use of 'Cadbury's PICNIC' for chocolates by Gujarat High Court. The Court held that the word 'PIKNIK' cannot be separated from the label mark and on the basis of that word alone, the plaintiff cannot claim action against the 6 NEW YORK - FEBRUARY, 1877 - COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Page 9 7 1999 PTC 617 ::: Downloaded on - 25/06/2015 23:59:00 ::: sat 11 nmsl 2540-2014 defendant using a common dictionary word PICNIC prefixed by the name of the company 'Cadbury'.
Bombay High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 8 - S C Gupte - Full Document
1