Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.52 seconds)

Promila Taneja vs Surendri Design Pvt. Ltd on 10 November, 2020

13. It is clear that words and expressions used in IBC which have not been defined but which have been defined in the Acts mentioned above can be directly imported. However, the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 and Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 do not appear to have been covered under the Section 3 (37) and thus definition of "Service" and "Activities" to be treated as supply of service cannot simply be lifted and applied in IBC. Learned Counsel for parties in Anup Shushil Dubey Vs. National Agriculture Co-operative Marketing Federation of India Limited & Ors do not appear to have brought this to Notice of Bench. For such reasons, with all due respect, we find that we are unable to have a second look at the opinion we arrived at in the Judgment in the matter of "Mr. M. Ravindranath Reddy Versus Mr G. Kishan & Ors."
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 16 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Jaipur Trade Expocentre Private ... vs M/S Metro Jet Airways Training Private ... on 5 July, 2022

"13. It is clear that words and expressions used in IBC which have not been defined but which have been defined in the Acts mentioned above can be directly imported. However, the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 423 of 2021 36 and Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 do not appear to have been covered under the Section 3 (37) and thus definition of "Service" and "Activities" to be treated as supply of service cannot simply be lifted and applied in IBC. Learned Counsel for parties in Anup Shushil Dubey Vs. National Agriculture Co-operative Marketing Federation of India Limited & Ors do not appear to have brought this to Notice of Bench. For such reasons, with all due respect, we find that we are unable to have a second look at the opinion we arrived at in the Judgment in the matter of "Mr. M. Ravindranath Reddy Versus Mr. G. Kishan & Ors."
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 32 - Cited by 3 - A Bhushan - Full Document

Jaipur Trade Expocentre Private ... vs M/S Metro Jet Airways Training Private ... on 7 March, 2022

"13. It is clear that words and expressions used in IBC which have not been defined but which have been defined in the Acts mentioned above can be directly imported. However, the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 423 of 2021 36 and Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 do not appear to have been covered under the Section 3 (37) and thus definition of "Service" and "Activities" to be treated as supply of service cannot simply be lifted and applied in IBC. Learned Counsel for parties in Anup Shushil Dubey Vs. National Agriculture Co-operative Marketing Federation of India Limited & Ors do not appear to have brought this to Notice of Bench. For such reasons, with all due respect, we find that we are unable to have a second look at the opinion we arrived at in the Judgment in the matter of "Mr. M. Ravindranath Reddy Versus Mr. G. Kishan & Ors."
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - A Bhushan - Full Document

Jaipur Trade Expocentre Private ... vs M/S Metro Jet Airways Training Private ... on 7 March, 2022

14. Learned Counsel for the Appellant has relied on Judgment of this Tribunal in "Anup Dubey Vs. National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd. & Ors." reported in 2020 OnLine NCLAT 674 (Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 229 of 2020) where the Tribunal held that subject to lease rental arising out of use of operational cold storage unit is Operational Debt. In this context, reference to Paragraph 20-22 of the Judgment is as follows:
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - A Bhushan - Full Document
1