Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.30 seconds)
Documents citing Jagmohan Behl vs Col Ks Gupta & Anr on 4 July, 2018

Ms. Poonam Krishna Manuja vs Mrs. Anupama Juneja on 10 June, 2022

37. If we assume that cheques were issued with respect to deposit, then also plaintiff can be held entitled to relief as limitation period for the same will commence from the date of demand i.e. after serving of legal notice. Counsel for the plaintiff in this respect relied upon the judgement of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Jagmohan Behl vs K.S. Gupta and Ors, Manu/DE/2337/2018. Presentment of cheque if of no consequence after demise of Sh. S. C. Juneja. Plaintiff has sufficiently proved that PW­1 and PW­2 had an arrangement with Sh. S. C. Juneja wherein Sh. S. C. Juneja used to accept deposits / loan from the plaintiff and also used to regularly pay the interest thereon. The cheques Ex PW 1/5 and Ex PW 1/7 are drawn on Indian Bank and the payment received by plaintiff of interest is also via cheque drawn on Indian Bank. However, plaintiff has not been able to prove the extent of estate received by defendants of Late Sh. S.C. Juneja. In the cross­ examination of DW­1, DW­1 has stated that Sh. S.C. Juneja had no properties. It was further stated that DW­1 has no knowledge about the bank account number 719060077.
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sameer Bajpai vs Dr. Puneet Kumar Goel & Ors on 23 May, 2023

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/09/2023 at 01:12:07 area and the washing area of the Respondent No. 3's receives water supply from the said water tank, and therefore it is imperative that the said water tank be restored forthwith and, in this regard, he also places reliance on the order dated 25.01.2016 which was passed in by the District Court in civil suit No. 19/2016 titled as "Satish Kumar Behl & Another Vs Col.(Retd) G.N. Bojpai & Others" filed by the Respondent No. 3 against the Petitioner. 2.2 He has also placed reliance upon the status report dated 26.07.2019 filed by MCD before the District Court in the civil suit. The report is filed as 'Annexure A-3' to CM APPL. 27842/2023. He states that the said report shows that the Respondent No. 3's access to the terrace has been restricted by the Petitioner and therefore the necessity to install the tank on the Chhajja.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - M P Arora - Full Document
1