Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.28 seconds)
Documents citing Ranjeet Kumar Gupta vs The State Of Chhattisgarh on 25 June, 2021

Anil Kumar Gupta vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 2 February, 2023

In the Act of 1915, a mechanism has been provided against the confiscation order for the appeal under Section 47-B of the Act, 1915, and the State counsel submits that as per Section 62 sub- section 2(c) of the Act 1915, has already framed the Rules related to appeal and review, through which against the order passed by the Collector an appeal lies to the Excise Commissioner as an appellate authority to hear such appeal and the same issue also came up before the co-ordinate bench in the matter of Ranjit Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Chhattisgarh in Writ Petition Criminal No.604 of 2018 on 29.01.2019, in which it has been held that when the alternate remedy is available, the petition is not maintainable.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anil Kumar Gupta vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 2 February, 2023

In the Act of 1915, a mechanism has been provided against the confiscation order for the appeal under Section 47-B of the Act, 1915, and the State counsel submits that as per Section 62 sub- section 2(c) of the Act 1915, has already framed the Rules related to appeal and review, through which against the order passed by the Collector an appeal lies to the Excise Commissioner as an appellate authority to hear such appeal and the same issue also came up before the co-ordinate bench in the matter of Ranjit Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Chhattisgarh in Writ Petition Criminal No.604 of 2018 on 29.01.2019, in which it has been held that when the alternate remedy is available, the petition is not maintainable.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanjay Lahare vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 10 February, 2023

In the Act of 1915, a mechanism has been provided against the confiscation order for the Appeal under Section 47-B of the said Act, and the State counsel submits that as per sub-section 2(c) of Section 62 of the said Act, rules relating to Appeal and review have already been framed through which, against the order passed by the Collector, an Appeal lies to the Excise Commissioner as an appellate authority to hear such Appeal and the same issue also came up before the co-ordinate bench in the matter of Ranjit Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Chhattisgarh in Writ Petition Criminal No.604 of 2018 decided on 29.01.2019 in which, it has been held that when the alternate remedy is available, the Petition is not maintainable.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raj Kumar Koshale vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 10 February, 2023

In the Act of 1915, a mechanism has been provided against the confiscation order for the Appeal under Section 47-B of the said Act, and the State counsel submits that as per sub-section 2(c) of Section 62 of the said Act, rules relating to Appeal and review have already been framed through which, against the order passed by the Collector, an Appeal lies to the Excise Commissioner as an appellate authority to hear such Appeal and the same issue also came up before the co-ordinate bench in the matter of Ranjit Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Chhattisgarh in Writ Petition Criminal No.604 of 2018 decided on 29.01.2019 in which, it has been held that when the alternate remedy is available, the Petition is not maintainable.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1