Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1477 (3.26 seconds)
Documents citing K.Manjusree Etc vs State Of A.P & Anr on 15 February, 2008

Humbe Tai Shahadev And Anr vs Maharashtra Public Service Commission ... on 22 December, 2023

"32. The respondents have also placed reliance on the decision of this Court in the case of K. Manjusree (supra). However, in our considered view, the facts of the aforesaid decision are quite different from the present case. A change was introduced for the first time after the entire process was over, based on the decision made by the Full Court qua the cut off. Secondly, it is not as if the private respondents were nonsuited from participating in the recruitment process. The principle governing changing the rules of game would not have any application when the change is with respect to 18 (2008) 3 SCC 512 ::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2023 07:43:03 ::: skn 77 --WP-2722.2023---.docx selection process but not the qualification or eligibility. In other words, after the advertisement is made followed by an application by a candidate with further progress, a rule cannot be brought in, disqualifying him to participate in the selection process. It is only in such cases, the principle aforesaid will have an application or else it will hamper the power of the employer to recruit a person suitable for a job."
Bombay High Court Cites 65 - Cited by 0 - N M Jamdar - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra Through ... vs Gajanan Santosh Chavan on 22 December, 2023

"32. The respondents have also placed reliance on the decision of this Court in the case of K. Manjusree (supra). However, in our considered view, the facts of the aforesaid decision are quite different from the present case. A change was introduced for the first time after the entire process was over, based on the decision made by the Full Court qua the cut off. Secondly, it is not as if the private respondents were nonsuited from participating in the recruitment process. The principle governing changing the rules of game would not have any application when the change is with respect to 18 (2008) 3 SCC 512 ::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2023 07:43:45 ::: skn 77 --WP-2722.2023---.docx selection process but not the qualification or eligibility. In other words, after the advertisement is made followed by an application by a candidate with further progress, a rule cannot be brought in, disqualifying him to participate in the selection process. It is only in such cases, the principle aforesaid will have an application or else it will hamper the power of the employer to recruit a person suitable for a job."
Bombay High Court Cites 65 - Cited by 0 - N M Jamdar - Full Document

Smt. Rohini Bhujang Gaikwad And Ors vs The Secretary Of Revenue And Forest ... on 22 December, 2023

"32. The respondents have also placed reliance on the decision of this Court in the case of K. Manjusree (supra). However, in our considered view, the facts of the aforesaid decision are quite different from the present case. A change was introduced for the first time after the entire process was over, based on the decision made by the Full Court qua the cut off. Secondly, it is not as if the private respondents were nonsuited from participating in the recruitment process. The principle governing changing the rules of game would not have any application when the change is with respect to 18 (2008) 3 SCC 512 ::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2023 07:43:37 ::: skn 77 --WP-2722.2023---.docx selection process but not the qualification or eligibility. In other words, after the advertisement is made followed by an application by a candidate with further progress, a rule cannot be brought in, disqualifying him to participate in the selection process. It is only in such cases, the principle aforesaid will have an application or else it will hamper the power of the employer to recruit a person suitable for a job."
Bombay High Court Cites 65 - Cited by 0 - N M Jamdar - Full Document

Indrajeet Arjun Pawar vs State Of Maha. Thr. Sec. Of Revenue And ... on 22 December, 2023

"32. The respondents have also placed reliance on the decision of this Court in the case of K. Manjusree (supra). However, in our considered view, the facts of the aforesaid decision are quite different from the present case. A change was introduced for the first time after the entire process was over, based on the decision made by the Full Court qua the cut off. Secondly, it is not as if the private respondents were nonsuited from participating in the recruitment process. The principle governing changing the rules of game would not have any application when the change is with respect to 18 (2008) 3 SCC 512 ::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2023 07:42:55 ::: skn 77 --WP-2722.2023---.docx selection process but not the qualification or eligibility. In other words, after the advertisement is made followed by an application by a candidate with further progress, a rule cannot be brought in, disqualifying him to participate in the selection process. It is only in such cases, the principle aforesaid will have an application or else it will hamper the power of the employer to recruit a person suitable for a job."
Bombay High Court Cites 65 - Cited by 0 - N M Jamdar - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra Through The ... vs Yojana Shriniwa Kulkarni on 22 December, 2023

"32. The respondents have also placed reliance on the decision of this Court in the case of K. Manjusree (supra). However, in our considered view, the facts of the aforesaid decision are quite different from the present case. A change was introduced for the first time after the entire process was over, based on the decision made by the Full Court qua the cut off. Secondly, it is not as if the private respondents were nonsuited from participating in the recruitment process. The principle governing changing the rules of game would not have any application when the change is with respect to 18 (2008) 3 SCC 512 ::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2023 07:43:21 ::: skn 77 --WP-2722.2023---.docx selection process but not the qualification or eligibility. In other words, after the advertisement is made followed by an application by a candidate with further progress, a rule cannot be brought in, disqualifying him to participate in the selection process. It is only in such cases, the principle aforesaid will have an application or else it will hamper the power of the employer to recruit a person suitable for a job."
Bombay High Court Cites 65 - Cited by 0 - N M Jamdar - Full Document

Abhaysinh Babasaheb Patil And Anr vs Govt. Of Maharashtra Thru The Prin. ... on 22 December, 2023

"32. The respondents have also placed reliance on the decision of this Court in the case of K. Manjusree (supra). However, in our considered view, the facts of the aforesaid decision are quite different from the present case. A change was introduced for the first time after the entire process was over, based on the decision made by the Full Court qua the cut off. Secondly, it is not as if the private respondents were nonsuited from participating in the recruitment process. The principle governing changing the rules of game would not have any application when the change is with respect to 18 (2008) 3 SCC 512 ::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2023 07:43:12 ::: skn 77 --WP-2722.2023---.docx selection process but not the qualification or eligibility. In other words, after the advertisement is made followed by an application by a candidate with further progress, a rule cannot be brought in, disqualifying him to participate in the selection process. It is only in such cases, the principle aforesaid will have an application or else it will hamper the power of the employer to recruit a person suitable for a job."
Bombay High Court Cites 65 - Cited by 0 - N M Jamdar - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra Through The ... vs Rajat Manohar Agrawal on 22 December, 2023

"32. The respondents have also placed reliance on the decision of this Court in the case of K. Manjusree (supra). However, in our considered view, the facts of the aforesaid decision are quite different from the present case. A change was introduced for the first time after the entire process was over, based on the decision made by the Full Court qua the cut off. Secondly, it is not as if the private respondents were nonsuited from participating in the recruitment process. The principle governing changing the rules of game would not have any application when the change is with respect to 18 (2008) 3 SCC 512 ::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2023 07:43:29 ::: skn 77 --WP-2722.2023---.docx selection process but not the qualification or eligibility. In other words, after the advertisement is made followed by an application by a candidate with further progress, a rule cannot be brought in, disqualifying him to participate in the selection process. It is only in such cases, the principle aforesaid will have an application or else it will hamper the power of the employer to recruit a person suitable for a job."
Bombay High Court Cites 65 - Cited by 0 - N M Jamdar - Full Document

Rohti Ajay Patil And Ors vs Akshay Ashok Chaudhari And Ors on 22 December, 2023

"32. The respondents have also placed reliance on the decision of this Court in the case of K. Manjusree (supra). However, in our considered view, the facts of the aforesaid decision are quite different from the present case. A change was introduced for the first time after the entire process was over, based on the decision made by the Full Court qua the cut off. Secondly, it is not as if the private respondents were nonsuited from participating in the recruitment process. The principle governing changing the rules of game would not have any application when the change is with respect to 18 (2008) 3 SCC 512 ::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2023 07:43:54 ::: skn 77 --WP-2722.2023---.docx selection process but not the qualification or eligibility. In other words, after the advertisement is made followed by an application by a candidate with further progress, a rule cannot be brought in, disqualifying him to participate in the selection process. It is only in such cases, the principle aforesaid will have an application or else it will hamper the power of the employer to recruit a person suitable for a job."
Bombay High Court Cites 65 - Cited by 0 - N M Jamdar - Full Document

Akshay Ashok Chaudhari And Ors vs Government Of Maharashtra Thr ... on 22 December, 2023

"32. The respondents have also placed reliance on the decision of this Court in the case of K. Manjusree (supra). However, in our considered view, the facts of the aforesaid decision are quite different from the present case. A change was introduced for the first time after the entire process was over, based on the decision made by the Full Court qua the cut off. Secondly, it is not as if the private respondents were nonsuited from participating in the recruitment process. The principle governing changing the rules of game would not have any application when the change is with respect to 18 (2008) 3 SCC 512 ::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2023 07:42:45 ::: skn 77 --WP-2722.2023---.docx selection process but not the qualification or eligibility. In other words, after the advertisement is made followed by an application by a candidate with further progress, a rule cannot be brought in, disqualifying him to participate in the selection process. It is only in such cases, the principle aforesaid will have an application or else it will hamper the power of the employer to recruit a person suitable for a job."
Bombay High Court Cites 65 - Cited by 0 - N M Jamdar - Full Document

Tej Prakash Pathak vs Rajasthan High Court on 7 November, 2024

(g) K. Manjusree (supra) is not in conflict with Subash Chander Marwaha (supra). Subash Chander Marwaha proceeds on the principle that existence of vacancies does not confer a right to a candidate placed in the select list to be appointed. K. Manjusree on the other hand deals with a situation where a candidate is denied placement in the select list only because after the interviews were over, minimum marks for the interviews, not prescribed earlier, were prescribed. The two decisions, therefore, operate in different fields.
Supreme Court of India Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next