Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.28 seconds)
Documents citing Dezhou Shengli Pipeline Crossing ... vs Ministry Of Petroleum And Natural Gas ... on 29 May, 2018

Mookerjee Port vs Marinecraft Engineers Private Limited on 20 January, 2026

In support of the contention that Council cannot decide on a work's contract, learned Advocate General has relied upon 2022 SCC OnLine AP 970 (Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited Vs. Union of India), 5 2026:CHC-OS:13-DB MANU/MH/2179/2021 (P. L. Adke vs. Wardha Municipal Corporation), MANU/GJ/0990/2018 (Samvit Buildcare Private Limited Vs. Ministry of Civil Aviation), (2017 SCC OnLine Bom 6829 (Sterling and Wilson Private Limited and Another Vs. Union of India and Others), 2022 SCC OnLine Patna 660 (Bihar offset Printers Association Vs. Union of India and Ors.), 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12718 (3R Technologies Vs. Union of India and Anr. ), 2018 SCC OnLine Del 9390 (Dezhou Shengli Pipeline Crossing Engineering India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas and Ors. ), 2015 SCC OnLine Del 13169 (M/s. Shree Gee Enterprises Vs. Union of India and Anr.), 2025 SCC OnLine All 1631 (Thoughtsol Infotech Private Limited Vs. Union of India and Others), 2025 SCC OnLine Pat 589 (Jai Mata Di Construction Co. Vs. Union of India and Others), 2025 SCC OnLine AP 299 (KMV Projects Limited vs. Andhra Pradesh Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council and Others).
Calcutta High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - D Basak - Full Document

M.Hema Arun Prakash vs Indian Oil Corporation (Marketing ... on 21 December, 2018

2.9. Taking support from a judgment of the Delhi High Court in Dezhou Shengli Pipeline Crossing Engineering India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas & Others [CDJ 2018 DHC 696], it is stated that the Delhi High Court, while dealing with the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, which applies to the present case, has given a direction to the Central Government to promote Micro and Small Enterprises, therefore, it goes without saying that the tenderer under MSE category should be given first priority by the first respondent, but, the same has not been done so in the present case. On this basis, he prayed for allowing the writ petition filed by him.
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - T Raja - Full Document
1