Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (1.15 seconds)
Documents citing Subbanna Hegde And Ors. vs Dyavappa Gowda on 3 March, 1980

Jimmy Jahangir Madan vs Bolly Cariyappa Hindley By L.Rs on 10 August, 2001

It pointed out in that decision that the decision rendered in Subbanna Hegde and Ors. v. Dyavappa Gowda, the three decisions of the Court have not been brought to the notice of the Court and therefore the object and purport of proviso of Sub-section (1) of Section 302 has not been considered. The learned Single Judge has not specifically answered the question as to who is competent to prosecute the complaint after the death of the complainant and what is the consideration and who is that competent person who could be permitted to prosecute the complaint and whether such person can prosecute the complaint personally or through power of attorney.
Karnataka High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - H N Narayan - Full Document

Adavi Narsaiah And Anothers vs The State Of Ap., Rep.Byits P.P And ... on 21 August, 2018

5. The counsel for the petitioners relies on the judgment of the Karnataka High Court reported in Subbanna Hegde and others v. Dyavappa Gowda Complainant1, wherein it was held that the Magistrate must acquit the accused in case of 1 1980 Cri.L.J.1405 2 absence of the complainant on the given date of adjournment due to his death. The Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka dealt with Section 256 Cr.P.C. and held as under:
Telangana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1