Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.43 seconds)
Documents citing Shakeer Ali vs State Rep By Its on 21 January, 2022

Kumar vs The State Rep. By Its on 5 December, 2024

6. Admittedly, out of seven cows and two bulls which were seized, one cow died and another cow had fled while in the custody of the respondent. The respondent has not collected any evidence to suggest that the cattle were transported for slaughtering. The route in which the cattle were taken namely from Vedaranyam to Orathanadu would prima facie show that the cattle were not meant for transporting to Kerala for slaughtering. This Court, in Shakeer Ali vs. The State rep.by its Inspector of Police , cited supra, had held that if it is not established that the cattle were meant for slaughtering, the same can be returned to the owner on stringent conditions.
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Krishnamoorthy vs The Inspector Of Police on 12 August, 2022

10. As rightly pointed out by the learned Judicial Magistrate, in two other decisions of this Court in Shakeer Ali Vs. State rep.by its The Inspector of Police, Karumathampatty Police Station, Coimbatore District and Ginjala Naga Appala Raju Vs. State Rep. by its The Inspector of Police, Avinashi 5/14 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.R.C.(MD).No.543 of 2022 Police Station, Thiruppur District, in Crl.R.C.No.965 of 2021 and Crl.R.C.No. 73 of 2022, dated 21.01.2022 and 02.02.2022 respectively, another learned Judge of this Court has held that the petitioners therein had handed over the cattles to the transporter for transporting the same from Krishnagiri to his cattle farm in Pollachi in the first case and from Thanjavur to his cattle farm in Pollachi. Admittedly, in both the above cases, the cattles were not transported for slaughtering and hence, the cattles were ordered to be returned to the petitioners/owners of the cattles on interim custody.
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Krishnamoorthy vs The Inspector Of Police on 12 August, 2022

10. As rightly pointed out by the learned Judicial Magistrate, in two other decisions of this Court in Shakeer Ali Vs. State rep.by its The Inspector of Police, Karumathampatty Police Station, Coimbatore District and Ginjala Naga Appala Raju Vs. State Rep. by its The Inspector of Police, Avinashi 5/14 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.R.C.(MD).No.543 of 2022 Police Station, Thiruppur District, in Crl.R.C.No.965 of 2021 and Crl.R.C.No. 73 of 2022, dated 21.01.2022 and 02.02.2022 respectively, another learned Judge of this Court has held that the petitioners therein had handed over the cattles to the transporter for transporting the same from Krishnagiri to his cattle farm in Pollachi in the first case and from Thanjavur to his cattle farm in Pollachi. Admittedly, in both the above cases, the cattles were not transported for slaughtering and hence, the cattles were ordered to be returned to the petitioners/owners of the cattles on interim custody.
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mohandass vs State Represented By on 4 August, 2025

10. As rightly pointed out by the learned Judicial Magistrate, in two other decisions of this Court in Shakeer Ali Vs. State rep.by its The Inspector of Police, Karumathampatty Police Station, Coimbatore District and Ginjala Naga Appala Raju Vs. State Rep. by its The Inspector of Police, Avinashi Police Station, Thiruppur District, in Crl.R.C.No.965 of 2021 and Crl.R.C.No.73 of 2022, dated 21.01.2022 and 02.02.2022 respectively, another learned Judge of this Court has held that the petitioners therein had handed over the cattles to the transporter for transporting the same from Krishnagiri to his cattle farm in Pollachi in the first case and from Thanjavur to his cattle farm in Pollachi. Admittedly, in both the above cases, the cattles were not transported for slaughtering and hence, the cattles were ordered to be returned to the petitioners/owners of the cattles on interim custody.
Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1