Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 78 (0.98 seconds)
Documents citing Dr. Rini Johar & Anr. vs State Of M.P.&Ors.; on 3 June, 2016

Sakul Hamid vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 February, 2023

(emphasis supplied) 17] It is worth mentioning here that the petitioners were arrested on 02.11.2019 and were subsequently released on bail by this Court only on 15.07.2021 in M.Cr.C. No.29973 of 2021, thus, they have been imprisoned for a period of 1 year and 8 months in this frivolous case lodged only at the whims and caprice of the concerned police officers. This Court is of the considered opinion that the investigation was apparently carried out with malafide intentions and there was no reason for the concerned police officer to apprehend the container backed by valid documents and count each and every one of 1600 boxes to come to a conclusion that there is a short fall of 59 boxes out of 1600 boxes, and this shows the deliberate attempt of the concerned police officers to falsely implicate the petitioners for ulterior motives which amounts to misfeasance, and considering the fact that the petitioners have spent more than 1 year and 8 months in jail, in clear violation of the their fundamental right guaranteed under Art.21 of the Constitution, this Court, while taking note of the decision rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Rini Johar and Ors. Vs. State of M.P. And Ors. (supra) wherein, the Supreme Court has granted a compensation of Rs.5 lakhs to each of the petitioners of the said case where they were arrested illegally and were required to spend three weeks and seventeen days in jail respectively, deems it appropriate to impose heavy cost on the State and thus, it is directed Signature Not Verified Signed by: BAHAR CHAWLA Signing time: 14-Feb-23 7:07:09 PM 13 that the State shall pay the petitioners, a sum of Rs.20 lakhs (Rupees Twenty Lakhs only) each towards compensation, to be paid by the State of M.P. within two months time and it will be open for the State Government to proceed against the erring officer, and recover the said amount from them after due process of law. 18] Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Mohinuddin Qureshi @ Munna Khan vs State Of Raj And Ors on 3 December, 2019

12. Continuation of proceedings in a case where police personnel have in utter disregard to the law laid down by the Apex Court and in utter disregard to the orders passed by the Court below, without serving notice under Section 41-A of Cr.P.C. has entered into house of the petitioner at 9.35 pm to arrest him in civil dress posing as courier boys, which is in violation of the judgment of the Apex Court in Rini Johar & Anr. Vs State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.(supra). Continuation of FIR would tantamount to abuse of process of law as admittedly petitioner and his son did not inflict any injuries to the police personnel, hence, FIR No.217/2016 is quashed.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - P Bhandari - Full Document

Mansingh Khumsingh Parmar vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 9 June, 2023

C. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in that nature directing the respondent no.3 not to violate the constitution rights of petitioner provided under article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India, without any proper procedure and evidence against the petitioner on the complaint done by the respondent no. 4 and 5 as per observation of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter between Dr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs State of M.P and Ors.
Bombay High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - G Godse - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next