Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (1.27 seconds)
Documents citing Exide Industries Ltd. vs Exide Technologies (Earlier Known As ... on 28 July, 2017

Century 21 Real Estate Llc vs Century 21 Town Planners Pvt Ltd And Anr on 6 March, 2026

M. Also, the expression "use of a mark" as contemplated under Section 2(2)(c) of the Trade Marks Act is of wide import. In the context of services, it includes reference to the availability, provision, or performance of services in India. "Use" is therefore not confined to instances of direct sales but extends to demonstrable market presence and the offering of services within India, both of which the Petitioner has sufficiently established. The decisions in R.J. Components and Shafts v. Deepak Industries Ltd. and Exide Industries Ltd. v. Exide Corporation, relied upon by Respondent No. 1, would be of no assistance to Respondent No. 1 since those cases arise in the context of infringement and passing-off actions and not actions for rectification.
Bombay High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Century 21 Real Estate Llc vs Century 21 Town Planners Pvt Ltd And Anr on 6 March, 2026

M. Also, the expression "use of a mark" as contemplated under Section 2(2)(c) of the Trade Marks Act is of wide import. In the context of services, it includes reference to the availability, provision, or performance of services in India. "Use" is therefore not confined to instances of direct sales but extends to demonstrable market presence and the offering of services within India, both of which the Petitioner has sufficiently established. The decisions in R.J. Components and Shafts v. Deepak Industries Ltd. and Exide Industries Ltd. v. Exide Corporation, relied upon by Respondent No. 1, would be of no assistance to Respondent No. 1 since those cases arise in the context of infringement and passing-off actions and not actions for rectification.
Bombay High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Century 21 Real Estate Llc vs Century 21 Town Planners Pvt Ltd And Anr on 6 March, 2026

M. Also, the expression "use of a mark" as contemplated under Section 2(2)(c) of the Trade Marks Act is of wide import. In the context of services, it includes reference to the availability, provision, or performance of services in India. "Use" is therefore not confined to instances of direct sales but extends to demonstrable market presence and the offering of services within India, both of which the Petitioner has sufficiently established. The decisions in R.J. Components and Shafts v. Deepak Industries Ltd. and Exide Industries Ltd. v. Exide Corporation, relied upon by Respondent No. 1, would be of no assistance to Respondent No. 1 since those cases arise in the context of infringement and passing-off actions and not actions for rectification.
Bombay High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Century 21 Real Estate Llc vs Century 21 Town Planners Pvt Ltd And Anr on 6 March, 2026

M. Also, the expression "use of a mark" as contemplated under Section 2(2)(c) of the Trade Marks Act is of wide import. In the context of services, it includes reference to the availability, provision, or performance of services in India. "Use" is therefore not confined to instances of direct sales but extends to demonstrable market presence and the offering of services within India, both of which the Petitioner has sufficiently established. The decisions in R.J. Components and Shafts v. Deepak Industries Ltd. and Exide Industries Ltd. v. Exide Corporation, relied upon by Respondent No. 1, would be of no assistance to Respondent No. 1 since those cases arise in the context of infringement and passing-off actions and not actions for rectification.
Bombay High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Century 21 Real Estate Llc vs Century 21 Town Planners Pvt Ltd And Anr on 6 March, 2026

M. Also, the expression "use of a mark" as contemplated under Section 2(2)(c) of the Trade Marks Act is of wide import. In the context of services, it includes reference to the availability, provision, or performance of services in India. "Use" is therefore not confined to instances of direct sales but extends to demonstrable market presence and the offering of services within India, both of which the Petitioner has sufficiently established. The decisions in R.J. Components and Shafts v. Deepak Industries Ltd. and Exide Industries Ltd. v. Exide Corporation, relied upon by Respondent No. 1, would be of no assistance to Respondent No. 1 since those cases arise in the context of infringement and passing-off actions and not actions for rectification.
Bombay High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suman Garg & Ors vs Kamal Kumar Garg & Ors on 2 April, 2024

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/04/2024 at 23:32:11 Court. However, leave has to be sought in accordance with the judgment of the Ld. Division Bench in Exide Industries Ltd. v. Exide Corporation USA; 2014 (58) PTC 200 (Del). In respect of adjourning the matter, documents ought to be exhibited, subject to orders passed by the Court.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D K Sharma - Full Document

Saptagiri Restaurant Pvt. Ltd vs Sh Pardeep Kumar & Ors on 3 April, 2024

d) Any additional documents submitted with the affidavit in evidence ought to be taken on record with the leave of the Court. However, leave has to be sought in accordance with the judgment of the Ld. Division Bench in Exide Industries Ltd. v. Exide Corporation USA; 2014 (58) PTC 200 (Del). In respect of adjourning the matter, documents ought to be exhibited, subject to orders passed by the Court.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - D K Sharma - Full Document
1