Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 68 (0.98 seconds)

Dahiben Prahaladbhai Patel W/O ... vs State Of Gujarat on 3 July, 2019

In identical facts situation this Court in the judgment in the case of Nitaben Nareshbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat reported in 2008 (1) GLR 884 and an unreported judgment in the case of Sachin Natwarlal Patel v. Registrar of Births and Deaths cum Talati cum Mantri in Special Civil Application No.9564/2018 dated 07.01.2019 has issued directions. Considering the ratio of the aforesaid judgments, it is clear that the Registering Authority is within its power under Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Death Act, 1969 and Rule 11 of the Gujarat Registration of Birth and Death Act, 2004, to correct the error as prayed for.
Gujarat High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - A Y Kogje - Full Document

Sarojben Prahladbhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat on 3 July, 2019

In identical facts situation this Court in the judgment in the case of Nitaben Nareshbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat reported in 2008 (1) GLR 884 and an unreported judgment in the case of Sachin Natwarlal Patel v. Registrar of Births and Deaths cum Talati cum Mantri in Special Civil Application No.9564/2018 dated 07.01.2019 has issued directions. Considering the ratio of the aforesaid judgments, it is clear that the Registering Authority is within its power under Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Death Act, 1969 and Rule 11 of the Gujarat Registration of Birth and Death Act, 2004, to correct the error as prayed for.
Gujarat High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - A Y Kogje - Full Document

Anal Sanjaykumar Patel vs The Registrar Health Birth And Death ... on 5 July, 2019

In identical facts situation this Court in the judgment in the case of Nitaben Nareshbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat reported in 2008 (1) GLR 884 and an unreported judgment in the case of Sachin Natwarlal Patel v. Registrar of Births and Deaths cum Talati cum Mantri in Special Civil Application No.9564/2018 dated 07.01.2019 has issued directions. Considering the ratio of the aforesaid judgments, it is clear that the Registering Authority is within its power under Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Death Act, 1969 and Rule 11 of the Gujarat Registration of Birth Page 2 of 3 Downloaded on : Wed Jul 10 23:27:24 IST 2019 C/SCA/6720/2018 ORDER and Death Act, 2004, to correct the error as prayed for.
Gujarat High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - A Y Kogje - Full Document

Hardik Jayprakash Mehta vs State Of Gujarat on 30 July, 2019

In identical facts situation this Court in the judgment in the case of Nitaben Nareshbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat reported in 2008 (1) GLR 884 and an unreported judgment in the case of Sachin Natwarlal Patel v. Registrar of Births and Deaths cum Talati cum Mantri in Special Civil Application No.9564/2018 dated 07.01.2019 has issued directions. Considering the ratio of the aforesaid judgments as well as the judgments cited by learned Advocate for the petitioners, it is clear that the Registering Authority is within its power under Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Death Act, 1969 and Rule 11 of the Gujarat Registration of Birth and Death Act, 2004, to correct the error as prayed for. Besides, the correction sought is only an innocuous one and the petitioners do not seek to derive any undue advantage out of such a change.
Gujarat High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A Y Kogje - Full Document

Manishaben Bhaveshbhai Bhalala vs State Of Gujarat on 16 January, 2020

In identical facts situation this Court in the judgment in the case of Nitaben Nareshbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat reported in 2008 (1) GLR 884 and an unreported judgment in the case of Sachin Natwarlal Patel v. Registrar of Births and Deaths cum Talati cum Mantri in Special Civil Application No.9564/2018 dated 07.01.2019 has issued directions. Considering the ratio of the aforesaid judgments, it is clear that the Registering Authority is within its power under Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Death Act, 1969 and Rule 11 of the Gujarat Registration of Birth and Death Act, 2004, to correct the error as prayed for.
Gujarat High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A Y Kogje - Full Document

Dimpalben Nileshbhai Gaami vs State Of Gujarat on 6 February, 2020

In identical facts situation this Court in the judgment in the case of Nitaben Nareshbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat reported in 2008 (1) GLR 884 and an unreported judgment in the case of Sachin Natwarlal Patel v. Registrar of Births and Deaths cum Talati cum Mantri in Special Civil Application No.9564/2018 dated 07.01.2019 has issued directions. Considering the ratio of the aforesaid judgments, it is clear that the Registering Authority is within its power under Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Death Act, 1969 and Rule 11 of the Gujarat Registration of Birth and Death Act, 2004, to correct the error as prayed for.
Gujarat High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A Y Kogje - Full Document

Shraddha Prafulbhai Chovatiya vs State Of Gujarat on 18 March, 2019

4. I have considered the submissions advanced and perused the records of the case. Considering the judgment of this Court reported in Nitaben Nareshbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat reported in 2008 (1) GLR 884 and an unreported judgment in the case of Sachin Natwarlal Patel v. Registrar of Births and Deaths cum Talati cum Mantri in Special Civil Application No.9564/2018 dated 07.01.2019 and considering the ratio of the aforesaid two judgments, it is clear that the Registering Authority is within its power under Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Death Act, 1969 and Rule 11 of the Gujarat Registration of Birth and Death Act, 2004.
Gujarat High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A Y Kogje - Full Document

Dharmin Manjibhai Raiyani vs Talati Cum Mantri Nesdi Gram Panchayat on 18 March, 2019

In identical facts situation this Court in the judgment in the case of Nitaben Nareshbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat reported in 2008 (1) GLR 884 and an unreported judgment in the case of Sachin Natwarlal Patel v. Registrar of Births and Deaths cum Talati cum Mantri in Special Civil Application No.9564/2018 dated 07.01.2019 has issued directions. Considering the ratio of the aforesaid two judgments, it is clear that the Registering Authority is within its power under Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Death Act, 1969 and Rule 11 of the Gujarat Registration of Birth and Death Act, 2004.
Gujarat High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A Y Kogje - Full Document

Patel Samirkumar Natvarlal vs State Of Gujarat on 27 March, 2019

In identical facts situation this Court in the judgment in the case of Nitaben Nareshbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat reported in 2008 (1) GLR 884 and an unreported judgment in the case of Sachin Natwarlal Patel v. Registrar of Births and Deaths cum Talati cum Mantri in Special Civil Application No.9564/2018 dated 07.01.2019 has issued directions. Considering the ratio of the aforesaid two judgments, it is clear that the Registering Authority is within its power under Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Death Act, 1969 and Rule 11 of the Gujarat Registration of Birth and Death Act, 2004.
Gujarat High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - A Y Kogje - Full Document

Shivani D/O. Dashrathbhai Prajapati ... vs State Of Gujarat on 9 April, 2019

In identical facts situation, this Court in an unreported judgment in the case of Sachin Natwarlal Patel v. Registrar of Births and Deaths cum Talati cum Mantri in Special Civil Application No.9564/2018 dated 07.01.2019 has issued directions. Considering the ratio of the aforesaid judgments, it is clear that the Registering Authority is within its power under Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Death Act, 1969 and Rule 11 of the Gujarat Registration of Birth and Death Act, 2004.
Gujarat High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A Y Kogje - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next