Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.42 seconds)
Documents citing Keda Kalu Wagh Patil vs Devidas Pandharinath Metkar on 22 March, 1972

Amrutrao Ratnakar Rajadnye vs Krishna Sakharam Patil & Others on 6 August, 1997

However, the said Single Judge distinguished two other judgments of this Court in the case of Kedu Kalu Wagh v. D.P. Metkar, , and in the of Rama Joshilkar v. Kiritkumar Desai, . The Single Judge distinguished the two cases on the ground that proceedings were pending before the Authorities when the Maharashtra Amendment of 1969 had come into force and the tenant had already expressed in these proceedings his desire to purchase the land. Therefore, the learned Single Judge has himself distinguished the judgment on the ground that if the proceedings were pending then in that event the requirement of giving fresh notice was not required. These judgments, therefore, are of no assistance to the petitioner and in no way would affect the view taken by me in this judgment.
Bombay High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 1 - F I Rebello - Full Document
1