Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.60 seconds)
Documents citing The State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo on 20 October, 2022

Dula Ram vs State Of H.P on 17 April, 2026

9. Learned counsel for the appellants have submitted that there are sufficient material discrepancies and contradictions in the statements of Police witnesses, warranting acquittal of both accused. Even otherwise by ignoring the judgment passed by this Court in Rajeev Kumar's case and considering ration of law laid down by the Apex Court in State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo and others, reported in 2022 (15) Scale 347, appellants deserves to be acquitted. Learned counsel for the appellants have submitted that respondents-State has failed ::: Downloaded on - 17/04/2026 20:39:38 :::CIS 6 2026:HHC:11878 Cr. Appeal Nos. 210 & 212 of 2009 to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt and, therefore, respondents are entitled to be acquitted.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - V S Thakur - Full Document

Dula Ram vs State Of H.P on 17 April, 2026

9. Learned counsel for the appellants have submitted that there are sufficient material discrepancies and contradictions in the statements of Police witnesses, warranting acquittal of both accused. Even otherwise by ignoring the judgment passed by this Court in Rajeev Kumar's case and considering ration of law laid down by the Apex Court in State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo and others, reported in 2022 (15) Scale 347, appellants deserves to be acquitted. Learned counsel for the appellants have submitted that respondents-State has failed ::: Downloaded on - 17/04/2026 20:39:37 :::CIS 6 2026:HHC:11878 Cr. Appeal Nos. 210 & 212 of 2009 to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt and, therefore, respondents are entitled to be acquitted.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - V S Thakur - Full Document

State Of H.P vs Bhag Chand on 22 November, 2023

3. On a reference, this Court in State of Himachal Pradesh v. Nirmal Kaur alias Nimmo and Ors. reported in MANU/SC/1371/2022, has decided the issue and it has been held that once it is found that the seized material ::: Downloaded on - 22/11/2023 20:33:02 :::CIS 6 contain 'morphine' and 'meconic acid' it is sufficient to establish that the seized material comes within the definition of Section 2(xvii) of the NDPS Act.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nirmal Singh And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 31 October, 2025

7. Keeping in mind the position of law and facts, circumstances of the case, chargesheet dated 02.02.2021 along with summoning order dated 15.04.2025 and entire criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No.1037 of 2025 (State Vs. Nirmal and others), arising out of Case Crime No.249 of 2020, under Sections 452, 354, 354-A, 323, 504, 506, 34 IPC, P.S. Todifatehpur, District Jhansi, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Garotha, Jhansi, are hereby quashed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document

Sadique Farook Shaikh vs The State Of Maharashtra on 14 June, 2024

Since there is a ba-763-2024.odt (4) scope to doubt about the commercial quantity of the contraband, the rigour of Section 37 of NDPS Act would not come in the way to consider the bail application. The offence under NDPS Act is too technical. The Investigation Officer has to follow the procedure strictly for the reasons that the offence is serious and the punishments are severe. The ratio laid down in the case of Hira Singh (cited supra) appears on different point. Hence, would not assist the learned APP.
Bombay High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Angrejo Devi on 23 November, 2022

3. On a reference, this Court in State of Himachal Pradesh v. Nirmal Kaur alias Nimmo and Others, reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 1462, has decided the issue and it has been held that once it is found that the seized material Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Narendra Prasad Date: 2022.11.23 17:45:58 IST contain ‘morphine’ and ‘meconic acid’ it is sufficient to Reason: establish that the seized material comes within the 1 definition of Section 2(xvii) of the NDPS Act.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nirmal And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 18 October, 2023

2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants to quash the charge sheet dated 18.11.2021; cognizance order dated 26.06.2023 as well as entire proceeding of Case No. 9210 of 2023 (State Vs. Nirmal and Others) arising out of Case Crime No. 218 of 2021, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 332, 336, 504, 427 I.P.C. and Section 7 Crl. Law Amendment Act, P.S. Khalilabad, District Sant Kabir Nagar, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sant Kabir Nagar.
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - D Verma - Full Document
1   2 Next