Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 42 (2.47 seconds)
Documents citing Amazon.Com Nv Investment Holdings Llc vs Future Retail Limited on 6 August, 2021

Gera Developments Pvt. Ltd., And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra Through The ... on 22 November, 2021

is a limited deeming provision for achieving a "purpose". In order to understand the meaning of this legal fiction, one has to identify the "purpose" for which the legal fiction is employed. Law, he has contended, is well-settled that although full effect is required to be given to the legal fiction, after identifying the "purpose" for which the legal fiction is employed, by virtue of the rule of purposive interpretation, it cannot be interpreted or permitted to travel beyond that purpose. Reliance in this connection has been placed by him on the decision of the Supreme Court in Nandkishore Ganesh Joshi vs. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Kalyan & Dombivali, reported in (2004) 11 SCC 417, which has been affirmed in State of Karnataka vs State of Tamil Nadu, reported in (2017) 3 SCC 362, as well as on the decisions in Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC vs Future Retail Limited, reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 557, and in Vineeta Sharma vs. Rakesh Sharma, reported in (2020) 9 SCC 1.
Bombay High Court Cites 51 - Cited by 0 - D Datta - Full Document

National Highways Authority Of India vs M/S. Patel Knr Heavy Infrastructure ... on 14 December, 2021

He also submits that the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Future Retail Ltd. (supra) was set aside by the Supreme Court in Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC & Ors. v. Future Retail Limited 2021 SCC Online SC 557, while holding that no appeal lies under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act against an order of enforcement of an emergency arbitrator's order made under Section 17 (2) of the Act. The impugned judgement of the Division Bench dated 08.02.2021 and 22.03.2021 were set aside.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - V Sanghi - Full Document

Ravi Sawhney & Ors vs Ramesh Kohli & Ors on 31 January, 2023

38. The limited extent of the legal fiction enshrined in Section Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed EX.P. 22/2021 Page 14 of 24 By:NEHA Signing Date:06.02.2023 18:49:09 36 as noticed in Vedanta was reiterated by the Supreme Court in its recent decision in Amazon.Com NV Investment Holdings LLC v. Future Retail Limited.8 as would be evident from the following passage:-
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - Y Varma - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next