Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 270 (3.48 seconds)
Documents citing High Court Of Gujarat & Anr vs Gujarat Kishan Mazdoor Panchayat & Ors on 10 March, 2003

Pravin P. Wategaonkar vs The Additional Chief Secretary, ... on 23 September, 2024

In High Court of Gujarat v. Gujarat Kishan Mazdoor Panchayat [High Court of Gujarat v. Gujarat Kishan Mazdoor Panchayat, (2003) 4 SCC 712 : 2003 SCC (L&S) 565] , in his concurring opinion in a three-Judge Bench, S.B. Sinha, J. held that : (SCC pp. 730-31, paras 22-23) "22. The High Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction in a matter of this nature is required to determine at the outset as to whether a case has been made out for issuance of a writ of certiorari or a writ of quo warranto. The jurisdiction of the High Court to issue a writ of quo warranto is a limited one. While issuing such a writ, the Court merely makes a public declaration but will not consider the respective impact on the candidates or other factors which may be relevant for issuance of a writ of certiorari.
Bombay High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - A B Borkar - Full Document

N.Kannadasan vs Ajoy Khose & Ors on 6 May, 2009

Our attention has furthermore been drawn to a decision of this Court in High Court of Gujarat and Another v. Gujarat Kishan Mazdoor Panchayat and Others (supra) wherein, one of us was a member. Therein the question which arose for consideration was as to whether without appointing the members, the President of the Industrial Court, which was to consist of three or more members out of which one may be a President, could have been appointed straightway without appointing him as a member.
Supreme Court of India Cites 94 - Cited by 149 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Energy Watchdog vs Union Of India & Ors on 6 November, 2017

In High Court of Gujarat v. Gujarat Kishan Mazdoor Panchayat [(2003) 4 SCC 712 : 2003 SCC (L&S) 565] S.B. Sinha, J., in his concurring opinion, while adverting to the concept of exercise of jurisdiction by the High Court in relation to a writ of quo warranto, has expressed thus: (SCC pp. 730-31, paras 22-23) "22. The High Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction in a matter of this nature is required to determine at the outset as to whether a case has been made out for issuance of a writ of certiorari or a writ of quo warranto. The jurisdiction of the High Court to issue a writ of quo warranto is a limited one. While issuing such a writ, the Court merely makes a public declaration but will not consider the respective impact on the candidates or other factors which may be relevant for issuance of a writ of certiorari.
Delhi High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 1 - C H Shankar - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 29 June, 2018

In High Court of Gujarat v. Gujarat Kishan Mazdoor Panchayat 6 (three-Judge Bench) Hon‟ble S.B. Sinha, J. concurring with the majority view held: (SCC pp. 730-31, paras 22-23) "22. The High Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction in a matter of this nature is required to Patna High Court CWJC No.7983 of 2017 dt.29-06-2018 20/22 determine at the outset as to whether a case has been made out for issuance of a writ of certiorari or a writ of quo warranto. The jurisdiction of the High Court to issue a writ of quo warranto is a limited one. While issuing such a writ, the Court merely makes a public declaration but will not consider the respective impact of the candidates or other factors which may be relevant for issuance of a writ of certiorari.
Patna High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - M K Shah - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next