Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.82 seconds)
Documents citing Lalita Sharma vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 July, 2008

Krishna Kumari vs State Of Haryana & Others on 20 April, 2012

In Lalit Sharma's case (supra), a Division Bench of this court held that dependents of government employees would be entitled to compassionate appointment in terms of the policy applicable at the time of death. In said case, government had floated a scheme for financial assistance for dependents in lieu of compassionate appointment. The Bench came to the conclusion that dependents of government employees who had died prior to issuance of policy dated 4.3.2003 containing provision of financial assistance were entitled to appointment on compassionate ground. However, others would be entitled to financial assistance in terms of schemes promulgated in 2003, 2005 and 2006.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - R Gupta - Full Document

Vikram vs U.H.B.V.N.L. & Others on 28 January, 2009

So far as the relief of financial assistance in respect of dependent of Government employee who CWP No.15530 of 2007 -3- died prior to 04.03.2003 is concerned, there was no provision in any of the instructions/ policy issued by the government for grant of financial assistance. So, the Government employee who died prior to 04.03.2003, his/her dependents are not entitled to compassionate assistance. However, the dependents of Government employees whose bread earner died after 04.03.2003, are entitled to financial assistance under the schemes of 2003, 2005 & 2006 whichever is applicable to the dependents provided they fulfil the conditions laid down under the said schemes. There is no reason for with-holding the relief of financial assistance to the dependents of government employee who died after 28.02.2003 in case their case is covered under any of the schemes referred to above. So, we have no hesitation in holding that in case the government employee has died after 04.03.2003, in that case, the petitioners are entitled to financial assistance, according to the scheme applicable to them, as discussed above.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Tewari - Full Document

Smt. Sudesh Sharma vs State Of Haryana & Others on 3 February, 2009

So far as the relief of financial assistance in respect of dependent of Government employee who died prior to 04.03.2003 is concerned, there was no provision in any of the instructions/ policy issued by the government for grant of financial assistance. So, the Government employee who died prior to 04.03.2003, his/her dependents are not entitled to compassionate assistance. However, the dependents of Government employees whose bread earner died after 04.03.2003, are entitled to financial assistance under the schemes of 2003, 2005 & 2006 whichever is applicable to the dependents provided they fulfil the conditions laid down under the said schemes. There is no reason for with-holding the relief of financial assistance to the dependents of government employee who died after 28.02.2003 in case their case is covered under any of the schemes referred to above. So, we have no hesitation in holding that in case the government employee has died after 04.03.2003, in that case, the petitioners are entitled to financial assistance, according to the scheme applicable to them, as discussed above.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Tewari - Full Document

Deepak vs State Of Haryana & Others on 3 February, 2009

So far as the relief of financial assistance in respect of dependent of Government employee who died prior to 04.03.2003 is concerned, there was no provision in any of the instructions/ policy issued by the government for grant of financial assistance. So, the Government employee who died prior to 04.03.2003, his/her dependents are not entitled to compassionate assistance. However, the dependents of Government employees whose bread earner died after 04.03.2003, are entitled to financial assistance under the schemes of 2003, 2005 & 2006 whichever is applicable to the dependents provided they fulfil the conditions laid down under the said schemes. There is no reason for with-holding the relief of financial assistance to the dependents of government employee who died after 28.02.2003 in case their case is covered under any of the schemes referred to above. So, we have no hesitation in holding that in case the government employee has died after 04.03.2003, in that case, the petitioners are entitled to financial assistance, according to the scheme applicable to them, as discussed above.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Tewari - Full Document

Smt. Vimla Dhankar vs Ccs on 8 November, 2011

" 16. So far as the relief of financial assistance in respect of dependent of Government employee who died prior to 4.3.2003 is concerned, there was no provision in any of the instructions/policy issued by the Government for grant of financial assistance. So, the Government employee who died prior to 4.3.2003, his/her dependents are not entitled to compassionate assistance. However, the dependents of Government employees whose bread winner died after 4.3.2003, are entitled to financial assistance under the schemes of 2003, 2005 and 2006 whichever is applicable to the dependents provided they fulfill the conditions laid down under the said schemes. There is no reason for withholding the relief of financial assistance to the dependents of Government employee who died after C.W.P. No.11461 of 2009 4 28.2.2003 in case their case is covered under any of the schemes, referred to above. So, we have no hesitation in holding that in case the Government employee has died after 4.3.2003, in that case, the petitioners are entitled to financial assistance, according to the scheme applicable to them, as discussed above."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Azad Singh vs State Of Haryana And Others on 19 February, 2009

The issue in this case is as to which rules would be applicable in a case where dependents of deceased government employees seek compassionate relief. Two Hon'ble Division Benches have taken a view that the rules in operation at the time of death would be applicable (in the judgments of this Court titled as Lalita Sharma V. State of Haryana in CWP No.6890 of 2007 decided on 11.7.2008 and Sheela Devi V. State of Haryana and another in CWP No.8844 of 2007 decided on 22.8.2008).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A Tewari - Full Document

"The Issue In This Case As To Which Rules ... vs State Of Haryana And Another on 15 February, 2010

"The issue in this case as to which rules would be applicable in a case where dependents of deceased government employees seeks compassionate relief. Two Hon'ble Division Benches have taken a view that the rules in operation at the time of death would be applicable (in the judgments of this Court titled as Lalita Sharma V. State of Haryana in CWP No.6890 of 2007 decided on 11.7.2008 and Sheela Devi Vs. State of Haryana and another in CWP No.8844 of 2007 decided on 22.8.2008).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dr.Vandana Singla vs State Of Punjab And Others on 19 January, 2012

Notwithstanding the resignation tendered, the petitioner relies upon two Division Bench decisions of this Court dated 8.7.2004 passed in CWP No.8012 of 2003 (Amrik Singh vesus State of Punjab and others) and dated 29.1.2007 (Annexure P-6) passed in CWP No.10953 of 2006 (Om Parkash versus Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government of Haryana and another), wherein the employee was held entitled for pensionary benefits on the assumption that the 'voluntarily resignation' was akin the 'voluntarily retirement' as the employee had served the State for more than the minimum period prescribed for his eligibility for pension, while the learned State counsel refers to a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Reserve Bank of India and another versus Cecil Dennis Solomon and another (AIR 2004 SC3196) ; a Division Bench decision of this Court in Dr.Lalit Kumar Sharma versus State of Haryana (1997 (3) SCT 611 as well as a Single Bench decision of this Court in Bhim Raj Goyal versus State of Punjab and others (2005 (1) SCT 327.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S Kant - Full Document

Gaurav vs State Of Haryana And Others on 20 February, 2009

The issue in this case is as to which rules would be applicable in a case where dependents of deceased government employees seek compassionate relief. Two Hon'ble Division Benches have taken a view that the rules in operation at the time of death would be applicable (in the judgments of this Court titled as Lalita Sharma V. State of Haryana in CWP No.6890 of 2007 decided on 11.7.2008 and Sheela Devi V. State of Haryana and another in CWP No.8844 of 2007 decided on 22.8.2008).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A Tewari - Full Document
1   2 Next