Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (1.06 seconds)
Documents citing Ashok Kumar Saboo (Huf) And Anr. vs Hindusthan Paper Corporation Limited ... on 10 April, 2007

Heiza Boilers (I) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs Union Of India on 20 July, 2009

There is no merit in the case of the petitioners that the letter concerning acceptance of Heiza's tender was received by Heiza in Kolkata. As will appear from the letter dated January 17, 1991, Heiza's offer was accepted by the Director of Supplies & Disposals in Mumbai. The arguments concerning the ouster clause incorporated in the contract concerned and the decisions in Tara Chand Boid v. Shikam Chand Bhora, AIR 1995 Ori 199, and Ashok Kumar Saboo (HUF) & Anr. v. Hindusthan Paper Corporation Ltd. & Ors., 2007 (3) CHN 533 relied on by counsel for the petitioners are totally irrelevant to the question under examination.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 13 - Cited by 5 - J K Biswas - Full Document

Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd vs M/S. Shyam Metallics & Energy Ltd. & Ors on 26 September, 2011

The learned Advocate General, relied upon 2007 (3) CHN 533 (Ashok K. Sahoo vs. Hindusthan Paper Corpn. Ltd.) for the proposition that forum selection clause is inapplicable where the public law field operates since the power under Article 226 cannot be scuttled down and/or limited on the plea that there is a forum selection clause in the agreement.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - S Sen - Full Document

Mrt Signals Limited And Another vs Union Of India And Others on 24 May, 2024

6. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner, while addressing the issue of territorial jurisdiction, cites Ashok Kumar Saboo (HUF) and another Vs. Hindusthan Paper Corporation Limited and others, reported at (2007) 3 CHN 533, for the proposition that the provisions under Article 226 of the Constitution cannot be contracted out by selecting one of the two competent forums as there cannot be estoppel against any provision of Constitutional law.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - S Bhattacharyya - Full Document

Kunal Sharma vs Union Of India & Ors on 13 January, 2026

In support of his contention, the appellant has relied on the 2 decision of a co-ordinate Bench in the case of Ashok Kumar Saboo (HUF) & Anr. Vs. Hindusthan Paper Corporation Limited & Ors. reported in (2007) SCC OnLine Cal 202 and also on the decision of a learned Single Judge in the case of Sri Pankaj Panwar Vs. Lalit Kala Akademi & Ors. reported in 2014 SCC OnLine Cal 14154.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1