Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.23 seconds)

G.Vijayakumar vs State Of Kerala on 24 September, 2010

9. The learned counsel for the petitioner also relied upon the decision of this Court in K.K.Venugopalan v. State of Kerala (2008(1) KHC 535) to contend that Section 47 of the Act enables an employee to claim that he be accommodated in a post with the same pay scale and service benefits. An identical question as raised in this Writ Petition was considered therein. W.P.(C)No.80/10 -8- The dictum laid down is evident from paragraph No.8, which is extracted below:
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - T R Nair - Full Document

Mr. Ram Avtar Gupta vs State on 6 August, 2012

She relied upon K.Venugopalan Vs State of Kerala 2003 Crl.L.J 1427 in which it was held that 'cognizance' indicates the point when Magistrate first takes judicial notice of an offence. Initiation of proceedings is entirely different from taking cognizance. In her opinion her Predecessor applied judicial mind on 05.10.2009 when first charge sheet was filed and order for further investigation was made. The Court again took cognizance of the offence on 16.03.2012 when the second charge sheet was filed.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1