Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.24 seconds)

Western India Match Co. Ltd vs Western India Match Co. Workers Union & ... on 9 January, 1970

In Muller & Phipps (India) (P) Ltd. v. Their Employees' Union(') the dispute related to the retrenchment of a workman and the failure of the employer to re-employ him in spite of its having re-employed two other employees out of their turn as against the turn of the con- cerned workman. The High Court rejected the employer's con- tention that the espousal of the union was not valid as it was made after the retrenched workman had ceased on his being retrenched to be a member of the union on the ground that if that contention were to be upheld it would mean that no union can ever espouse the cause of a retrenched workman.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 124 - J M Shelat - Full Document

M. Sekaran vs The General Manager on 8 December, 2005

In MULLER AND PHIPPS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., v. THEIR EMPLOYEES [1967 (2) LLJ 222 at 225], the Punjab and Haryana High Court held that vacancy caused by retrenchment filled by promotion was held to be not valid as it defeats the provisions of Section 25 H and the statute could be easily circumvented by an employer who, for some ulterior motive, did not want to offer re-employment to a retrenched worker and the court upheld the order of deemed re-employment ordered by the Industrial Court.
Madras High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 2 - P Sathasivam - Full Document
1