Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.47 seconds)

Rajbir Singh vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 14 November, 2014

It was further submitted that despite there being no exercise for collection of quantifiable data and information or compliance of Article 335 of the Constitution, the 2013 policy providing for 20% reservation in promotion to Scheduled Castes employees for Class-III and Class-IV posts was issued. This fact is even admitted by the State in the reply, wherein it has been stated that though a Committee had been constituted but final report is still to be submitted. The same is totally contrary to the judgments of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in M. Nagaraj's case (supra) and this Court in Prem Kumar Verma's case (supra), as upheld in Devender Sachdeva's case MANOJ KUMAR 2014.11.14 14:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP No. 25512 of 2012 [4] (supra). The action of the State is rather contemptuous.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 16 - R Bindal - Full Document

Rishipal Sharma & Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 18 March, 2014

Petitioners have approached this Court praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to take action in accordance with the judgment in CWP No.17280 of 2011, titled as 'Prem Kumar Verma & others Vs. State of Haryana, decided on 07.08.2012 (Annexure P-7) as affirmed in LPA No.1352 of 2012, titled as 'Devender Sachdeva & others Vs. Kurukshetra University & others', decided on 10.10.2012 (Annexure P-8) which judgment has been accepted on instructions dated 20.02.2013 (Annexure P-9).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A G Masih - Full Document

Date Of Decision : April vs State Of Haryana And Others on 1 April, 2014

It is further asserted that in LPA No. 1352 of 2012 titled as Devender Sachdeva and others vs. Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra and others, a Division Bench of this Court has again set aside the Instructions dated 16.03.2006 vide judgment dated 10.10.2012 (Annexure P-5). It has also been stated that the judgment passed by the Single Judge in CWP No. 17280 of 2011 has also been upheld in the said judgment. The State of Haryana has not preferred any further appeal against the said order and has rather accepted the same by issuing the Instructions dated 20.02.2013 (Annexure P-6).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A G Masih - Full Document
1