Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.32 seconds)
Documents citing Ramesh Chandra Chaubey & Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Karmik Lko & ... on 16 July, 2019

Mool Chand Singh vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 2 August, 2021

6. It is also stated that the initiation of inquiry against the petitioner is also in teeth of Paras 492 and 493 of U.P. Police Regulations. From bare perusal of the Regulations 492 and 493 would go to show that whenever a Police officer has been judicially tried, then the Superintendent must await the decision of the judicial trial, if any, before deciding whether further departmental action is necessary.In support of his submissions, he has placed reliance on the judgment dated 28.9.2016 passed by Lucknow Bench of this Court in bunch of writ petitions with leading Service Single No.936 of 2015 (Sanjay Rai v. State of U.P. & Ors.), the order dated 3.2.2017 passed in Writ-A No.22248 of 2016 (Ramesh Chaubey v. State of U.P. & Ors.).
Allahabad High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 1 - M C Tripathi - Full Document

Bihari Lal vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., ... on 28 August, 2025

7. From perusal of the judgment of this Court in the case ofAlok Chandra Chaubey (supra)it clearly emerges that the respondents can only initiate proceedings for recovery from the gratuity only in the circumstances as provided in Article 351-A of the Civil Service Regulations which prohibits recovery unless departmental proceedings are instituted and that too subject to limitations specified inRegulation 351-A (a)(i)(ii) and (iii) of the Regulations.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Moin - Full Document

Krishna vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 5 March, 2021

In the facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending for consideration and without adverting on the merit of the case, the writ petition stands disposed of finally with the direction to the competent authority to decide the aforementioned representation of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law keeping in mind the law laid down in Rakesh Chaubey (supra), as expeditiously as possible and preferably within six weeks from the date of production of a copy of this order before him.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - M C Tripathi - Full Document
1