Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)
Documents citing Lakshmi Vilas Bank Employees Union, ... vs The Presiding Officer, Industrial ... on 18 July, 2002

Coimbatore District Mill Workers ... vs National Textile Corporation Limited on 19 July, 2011

9.The learned counsel for the petitioner also referred to an unreported judgment of this court in W.P.No.16439 of 1995, dated 18.07.2002 in Lakshmi Vilas Bank Employees Union Vs. The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Madras and another. That case arose out of the Award passed by the Industrial Tribunal and that the Award passed by the industrial tribunal was set aside by this court on the ground that withdrawal of key allowances is part of the service conditions of employees. Therefore, any withdrawal without giving 21 days clear notice under Section 9A will be invalid. In that case, there was a finding and further the case arose out of the dispute adjudicated by the industrial tribunal and not in the writ petition directly seeking for the relief.
Madras High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - K Chandru - Full Document

The Management Of Chemplast vs The Presiding Officer on 10 October, 2018

the principle laid down in the said judgment [cited supra], where exactly the same issue had been decided and the only difference is that the said issue pertain to the earlier Settlement dated 26.12.1992 and the present issue in this writ petition is in respect of the subsequent Settlement dated 21.03.1998, the learned counsel would submit that the respondents 2 and 3 herein/workmen are not entitled to seek for any benefit since they have been excluded specifically under Clause 5 of the present Settlement as extracted above and therefore, the impugned order passed by the Labour Court is liable to be interfered with.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - R S Kumar - Full Document
1