Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.22 seconds)

Banti @ Jitendra Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 May, 2020

First, that the accused must be in the custody of a police officer, Secondly, the accused must have given an information to the police (the exception contemplated by Section 27 of the Act is that even though this information may amount to a confession), Thirdly, there must be discovery of an instrument and, Fourthly, information must relate directly to the fact discovered (See:- Ramua Vs. State of U.P., 1992 CRLJ 3972).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 10 - A Pathak - Full Document
1