Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 192 (3.36 seconds)
Documents citing Naga People'S Movement, Of Human Rights ... vs Union Of India on 27 November, 1997

Veer Vikram Singh vs Central Board Of Indirect Taxes &Amp ... on 25 June, 2019

49. Recently a Constitution Bench in Naga People's Movement of Human Rights Vs. Union of India, (1998) 2 SCC 109, held that 'colourable legislation' is enacting by the Legislature of a legislation seeking to do indirectly what it cannot do directly. But ultimately, the crucial question would be - Whether the Legislature had the competence to enact the legislation ? If the impugned legislation falls within the competence of the Legislature, the question of doing something indirectly which cannot be done directly becomes irrelevant.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Tej Bir Singh vs Central Board Of Indirect Taxes &Amp ... on 25 June, 2019

49. Recently a Constitution Bench in Naga People's Movement of Human Rights Vs. Union of India, (1998) 2 SCC 109, held that 'colourable legislation' is enacting by the Legislature of a legislation seeking to do indirectly what it cannot do directly. But ultimately, the crucial question would be - Whether the Legislature had the competence to enact the legislation ? If the impugned legislation falls within the competence of the Legislature, the question of doing something indirectly which cannot be done directly becomes irrelevant.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Welfare Assocn. A.R.P., Maharashtra & ... vs Ranjit P. Gohil & Ors on 18 February, 2003

Recently a Constitution Bench in Naga People's Movement of Human Rights Vs. Union of India, (1998) 2 SCC 109, held that 'colourable legislation' is enacting by the Legislature of a legislation seeking to do indirectly what it cannot do directly. But ultimately, the crucial question would be - Whether the Legislature had the competence to enact the legislation ? If the impugned legislation falls within the competence of the Legislature, the question of doing something indirectly which cannot be done directly becomes irrelevant.
Supreme Court of India Cites 46 - Cited by 105 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Lourembam Deben Singh vs Union Of India on 12 November, 2018

8. Notwithstanding the law laid down by a Constitution Bench of this Court in Naga People’s Movement of Human Rights v. Union of India and the explicit directions given by this Court in Extra-Judicial Execution Victim Families Association v. Union of India [EEVFAM] the CBI was seemingly following up rather casually and taking its own time to complete investigations, which were required to be completed by 31st December, 2017 and prepare charge-sheets/final reports, wherever necessary.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 1 - M B Lokur - Full Document

Changappa P S vs Comptroller And Auditor-General Of ... on 25 June, 2019

49. Recently a Constitution Bench in Naga People's Movement of Human Rights Vs. Union of India, (1998) 2 SCC 109, held that 'colourable legislation' is enacting by the Legislature of a legislation seeking to do indirectly what it cannot do directly. But ultimately, the crucial question would be - Whether the Legislature had the competence to enact the legislation ? If the impugned legislation falls within the competence of the Legislature, the question of doing something indirectly which cannot be done directly becomes irrelevant.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R Shivakumara vs M/O Home Affairs on 21 June, 2019

49. Recently a Constitution Bench in Naga People's Movement of Human Rights Vs. Union of India, (1998) 2 SCC 109, held that 'colourable legislation' is enacting by the Legislature of a legislation seeking to do indirectly what it cannot do directly. But ultimately, the crucial question would be - Whether the Legislature had the competence to enact the legislation ? If the impugned legislation falls within the competence of the Legislature, the question of doing something indirectly which cannot be done directly becomes irrelevant.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 129 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sukhvir Singh vs Central Board Of Indirect Taxes &Amp ... on 25 June, 2019

49. Recently a Constitution Bench in Naga People's Movement of Human Rights Vs. Union of India, (1998) 2 SCC 109, held that 'colourable legislation' is enacting by the Legislature of a legislation seeking to do indirectly what it cannot do directly. But ultimately, the crucial question would be - Whether the Legislature had the competence to enact the legislation ? If the impugned legislation falls within the competence of the Legislature, the question of doing something indirectly which cannot be done directly becomes irrelevant.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kuldeep Singh vs D/O Revenue on 25 June, 2019

49. Recently a Constitution Bench in Naga People's Movement of Human Rights Vs. Union of India, (1998) 2 SCC 109, held that 'colourable legislation' is enacting by the Legislature of a legislation seeking to do indirectly what it cannot do directly. But ultimately, the crucial question would be - Whether the Legislature had the competence to enact the legislation ? If the impugned legislation falls within the competence of the Legislature, the question of doing something indirectly which cannot be done directly becomes irrelevant.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 43 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepak vs D/O Revenue on 25 June, 2019

49. Recently a Constitution Bench in Naga People's Movement of Human Rights Vs. Union of India, (1998) 2 SCC 109, held that 'colourable legislation' is enacting by the Legislature of a legislation seeking to do indirectly what it cannot do directly. But ultimately, the crucial question would be - Whether the Legislature had the competence to enact the legislation ? If the impugned legislation falls within the competence of the Legislature, the question of doing something indirectly which cannot be done directly becomes irrelevant.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 43 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kshitiji Gedam vs D/O Revenue on 28 June, 2019

49. Recently a Constitution Bench in Naga People's Movement of Human Rights Vs. Union of India, (1998) 2 SCC 109, held that 'colourable legislation' is enacting by the Legislature of a legislation seeking to do indirectly what it cannot do directly. But ultimately, the crucial question would be - Whether the Legislature had the competence to enact the legislation ? If the impugned legislation falls within the competence of the Legislature, the question of doing something indirectly which cannot be done directly becomes irrelevant.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 43 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next