Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 139 (0.53 seconds)
Documents citing Ghanshyam Gupta vs State Of U.P. on 25 August, 2020

Shamim Anwar Hashmi @ Munna vs State Of U.P.Through Secy. Home Lko.And ... on 13 July, 2022

In Ghanshyam Gupta v. State of U.P. and others [2016 (34) LCD 3035] this Court has again held that the necessary ingredients to invoke jurisdiction of the licencing authority in terms of Section 17 were clearly lacking and no finding had been returned on the basis of materials produced in that regard by the licencing authority, which must justify passing of the order of cancellation. Paragraph 9 of the said judgment is being quoted as under:
Allahabad High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - M Kumar - Full Document

Muslim vs State Of U.P.Throu.Secy.Of Home Civil ... on 5 August, 2022

In Ghanshyam Gupta v. State of U.P. and others [2016 (34) LCD 3035] this Court has again held that the necessary ingredients to invoke jurisdiction of the licencing authority in terms of Section 17 were clearly lacking and no finding had been returned on the basis of materials produced in that regard by the licencing authority, which must justify passing of the order of cancellation. Paragraph 9 of the said judgment is being quoted as under:
Allahabad High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - M Kumar - Full Document

Rana Ajeet Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru Its Secy.Home ... on 5 August, 2022

In Ghanshyam Gupta v. State of U.P. and others [2016 (34) LCD 3035] this Court has again held that the necessary ingredients to invoke jurisdiction of the licencing authority in terms of Section 17 were clearly lacking and no finding had been returned on the basis of materials produced in that regard by the licencing authority, which must justify passing of the order of cancellation. Paragraph 9 of the said judgment is being quoted as under:
Allahabad High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - M Kumar - Full Document

Parshu Ram vs State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Home ... on 14 September, 2022

In Ghanshyam Gupta v. State of U.P. and others [2016 (34) LCD 3035] this Court has again held that the necessary ingredients to invoke jurisdiction of the licencing authority in terms of Section 17 were clearly lacking and no finding had been returned on the basis of materials produced in that regard by the licencing authority, which must justify passing of the order of cancellation. Paragraph 9 of the said judgment is being quoted as under:
Allahabad High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - M Kumar - Full Document

Rajeev Kumar @ Monu Shukla vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Home And ... on 14 September, 2022

In Ghanshyam Gupta v. State of U.P. and others [2016 (34) LCD 3035] this Court has again held that the necessary ingredients to invoke jurisdiction of the licencing authority in terms of Section 17 were clearly lacking and no finding had been returned on the basis of materials produced in that regard by the licencing authority, which must justify passing of the order of cancellation. Paragraph 9 of the said judgment is being quoted as under:
Allahabad High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 1 - M Kumar - Full Document

Shyam Lal vs Commissioner Lukcnow Division Lucknow ... on 20 October, 2022

In Ghanshyam Gupta v. State of U.P. and others [2016 (34) LCD 3035] this Court has again held that the necessary ingredients to invoke jurisdiction of the licencing authority in terms of Section 17 were clearly lacking and no finding had been returned on the basis of materials produced in that regard by the licencing authority, which must justify passing of the order of cancellation. Paragraph 9 of the said judgment is being quoted as under:
Allahabad High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - M Kumar - Full Document

Naushad vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 14 November, 2022

In Ghanshyam Gupta v. State of U.P. and others [2016 (34) LCD 3035] this Court has again held that the necessary ingredients to invoke jurisdiction of the licencing authority in terms of Section 17 were clearly lacking and no finding had been returned on the basis of materials produced in that regard by the licencing authority, which must justify passing of the order of cancellation. Paragraph 9 of the said judgment is being quoted as under:
Allahabad High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - P Padia - Full Document

Suresh Singh Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 14 November, 2022

In Ghanshyam Gupta v. State of U.P. and others [2016 (34) LCD 3035] this Court has again held that the necessary ingredients to invoke jurisdiction of the licencing authority in terms of Section 17 were clearly lacking and no finding had been returned on the basis of materials produced in that regard by the licencing authority, which must justify passing of the order of cancellation. Paragraph 9 of the said judgment is being quoted as under:
Allahabad High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 2 - P Padia - Full Document

Abhay Kumar Singh vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 15 November, 2022

In Ghanshyam Gupta v. State of U.P. and others [2016 (34) LCD 3035] this Court has again held that the necessary ingredients to invoke jurisdiction of the licencing authority in terms of Section 17 were clearly lacking and no finding had been returned on the basis of materials produced in that regard by the licencing authority, which must justify passing of the order of cancellation. Paragraph 9 of the said judgment is being quoted as under:
Allahabad High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - P Padia - Full Document

Lokman Singh vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 21 November, 2022

In Ghanshyam Gupta v. State of U.P. and others [2016 (34) LCD 3035] this Court has again held that the necessary ingredients to invoke jurisdiction of the licencing authority in terms of Section 17 were clearly lacking and no finding had been returned on the basis of materials produced in that regard by the licencing authority, which must justify passing of the order of cancellation. Paragraph 9 of the said judgment is being quoted as under:
Allahabad High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - P Padia - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next