Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.52 seconds)
Documents citing Ratendra Kumar vs Karya Nirikshak, Hathras Junction And ... on 30 July, 2018

Sachin Saini vs Mukesh Saini on 28 August, 2024

In Ratendra Kumar Vs. Karya Nirikshak, Hathras Junction, 2018(6) All. LJ 386 the Hon'ble High Court held that no one can transfer a better title than he himself has and the buyer must be vigilant at the time of purchasing property and must inquire properly about the title of the seller. In the said case, the disputed land was belonging to government (railways), but it was sold to the plaintiff­appellant by one Shyama Devi vide registered Sale Deed dated 23.12.1983 for consideration amount of ₹20,000/­. It was held by the Hon'ble High Court as follows:
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mukesh Saini vs Sachin Saini on 28 August, 2024

In Ratendra Kumar Vs. Karya Nirikshak, Hathras Junction, 2018(6) All. LJ 386 the Hon'ble High Court held that no one can transfer a better title than he himself has and the buyer must be vigilant at the time of purchasing property and must inquire properly about the title of the seller. In the said case, the disputed land was belonging to government (railways), but it was sold to the plaintiff­appellant by one Shyama Devi vide registered Sale Deed dated 23.12.1983 for consideration amount of ₹20,000/­. It was held by the Hon'ble High Court as follows:
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Radha Kishan vs Kishan Lal on 13 January, 2025

In Ratendra Kumar Vs. Karya Nirikshak, Hathras Junction, 2018(6) All. LJ 386 the Hon'ble High Court held that no one can transfer a better title than he himself has and the buyer must be vigilant at the time of purchasing property and must inquire properly about the title of the seller. In view of the above, the plaintiff can not claim to have acquired perfect title with respect to the suit property on the basis of the documents alleged to be executed in favour of Laxman Singh and then by Laxman Singh in favour of him.
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1