Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.75 seconds)
Documents citing Smt. Anshu Goel And Another vs State Of U.P And Another on 16 April, 2020

X (Minor) vs State Of U.P. And Another on 26 May, 2022

In the result, this revision succeeds and is allowed. The impugned judgment and order dated 31.03.2022 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge POCSO Act)-IInd, Court No. 15 Gautam Budh Nagar in Criminal Appeal No.28 of 2022 ( Anshu versus State of UP) and affirming the order dated 22.02.2022 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Gautam Budh Nagar are hereby set aside and reversed. The bail application of the revisionist stands allowed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - S Ahmed - Full Document

Babu Bhai Yadav @ Anshu vs State Of U.P. Thru. Home Secy. Lko. And ... on 2 December, 2022

Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the order dated 25.08.2022 passed by learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, District Lucknow in Criminal Misc. Case No.7484 of 2022 (Computerized CRN No.UPLKO10128502022) Crime No.15/2021, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 504, 506, 307, 325 I.P.C. and 3 (1) (Da), 3 (1) (Dha) SC/ST Act, Police Station Para, District Lucknow "Babu Bhai alias Anshu vs. State of U.P." is set aside.
Allahabad High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Of Up vs Surendra Singh S/O Bhagwat Singh on 10 September, 2024

17. The trial court after considering the entire evidence and material on record has reached a just and fair conclusion that prosecution has miserably filed to prove the case against the accused-respondent beyond reasonable doubt and has thus acquitted the accused-respondent, which order is just, proper and legal and do not call for any interference by this Court. He has further submitted that against the impugned judgment and order dated 19.10.2021, first informant Anshu has preferred Criminal Appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C. No.267 of 2021 (Smt. Anshu Vs. State of U.P. and another). The said appeal has already been dismissed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide judgment and order dated 31.03.2023. The said order has not been challenged before the higher court and has thus become final.
Allahabad High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - R Gupta - Full Document

Radhe @ Girish Chandra @ Abhi vs State Of U.P. on 7 November, 2023

Bail Application No.25396 of 2023 (Anshu Vs. State of UP). He, therefore, submit that since the case of the applicant is at better footing to that of the aforesaid co-accused, the applicant is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. It is further contended that there is criminal history of four cases against the applicant which has been explained in paragraph-10 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. There is criminal history of two more cases against the applicant which has been mentioned in paragraph-4 of the supplementary affidavit. There is no likelihood of his abscondence or tampering with the evidence. The applicant is languishing in jail since 01.02.2023. In case the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the said liberty.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt Anshu And Another vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 28 May, 2025

5. We find that the impugned first information report has been lodged pursuant to the direction of this Court dated 12.5.2025 in Writ C No. 30220 of 2024 (Smt Anshu And Another vs. State of U.P. and others) along with other connected petitions, wherein after investigation direction for registration of first information report was made and it was observed that forged marriage certificates were prepared by the accused persons.
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - V K Birla - Full Document
1