Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 242 (0.94 seconds)

M/S. Apollo Hospitals Enterprises Ltd vs Union Of India on 26 April, 2023

88. However, in Faridabad CT Scan Centre's case (cited supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has considered in respect of Faridabad CT Scan Centre and therefore, the said judgment is of no avail to the petitioners, since the scope of the conditions stipulated and its compliance with reference to the notification No.64/1988 was not elaborately considered in the said judgment.

Kailash Diagnostic & Rehabilitation ... vs D.G. Of Health Services on 18 June, 2002

)], Nilagiri Cancer Centre (P) Ltd., v. Director General of Health Services & Ors. W.P. No. 16050 of 1999 (Madras High Court) , and Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai v. Jagdish Cancer & Research Centre - , but in view of the judgment of the 3-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Faridabad CT. Scan Centre v. D. G. Health Services & Ors. (2nd supra) the position is crystal clear and the matter is not res integra.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 12 - Cited by 2 - B Nazki - Full Document

M/S. R.G. Stone Urological Research ... vs Union Of India & Ors. on 24 September, 2010

In the meanwhile, within nine months of the decision in Mediwell Hospital case, the issue was again examined by a three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Faridabad CT. Scan Centre v. D.G. Health Services. The Petitioner was aggrieved by the denial of the CDEC and cited the cases of certain others similarly placed who had been granted such CDECs.
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next