Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.64 seconds)
Documents citing V. Hariharan Pillai vs State Of Kerala Represented By Its Chief ... on 31 January, 1967

L.V. Garchar vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 11 October, 2004

10. The appellant Shri R.V. Pillai in R.V. Pillai v. State of Kerala, 2004 SCSLJ 298, belonged to forward caste. He however obtained a certificate from the Tehsildar stating that he was a member of the Vettuvan Community. On the basis of this caste certificate he obtained a job as Assistant in the Legislative Secretariat and was subsequently directly recruited to the post of Dy. S.P. again also against the post reserved for Scheduled Castes. He was subsequently promoted and included in the cadre of IPS. On receipt of a complaint that he has obtained a false caste certificate a full fledged anthropological enquiry was held into the caste status of the applicant. It was found by KIRTADS (Kerala Institute for Research. Training and Development Studies of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes) that the applicant did not belong to Scheduled Caste Community.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Thomas vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 19 April, 1974

14. Counsel for the respondents invited our attention to paragraph 16 of the decision of the Supreme Court reported in General Manager, Southern Railway and Anr. v. Rangachari , and to the decision of this Court in V. Hariharan Pillai v. Stats of Kerala, A I.R 1968 Kerala 43,and paragraph 7 of the decision of the Supreme Court in State of Punjab v. Hira Lal and Ors. . We are unable to find anything in these decisions and in the passages referred to which is opposed to what we have stated above.
Kerala High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gauri Shankar Verma vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 9 September, 1981

11. The above case was followed by a Division Bench of Andhra, Pradesh High Court in Desu Rayudu v. A. P. Public Service Commission, AIR 1967 Andh Pra 353, and Full Bench of Kerala High Court in V. Hariharan Pillai v. State of Kerala, AIR 1968 Ker 42, In the former case, the learned Bench held that any help on the basis of caste may result in assisting even those who do not deserve such assistance merely because they belong to that caste and also denying such help to those who deserve merely because they belong to certain castes not included in the list of 'backward classes'. All those who deserved economic assistance under the previous arrangement for advancement of education would continue to get under the new criteria based on economic considerations. It is only those who were getting the assistance without deserving it that are perhaps left with a grievance. The economic basis, therefore, not only removes the abovesaid defects, but puts the assistance of equitable and socially just basis and extends a helping hand to all those who really deserve such assistance for their advancement in education. The learned Bench consequently rejected the contention that economic considerations cannot be the basis for determining any assistance to be given under Art. 15(4).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1