Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.69 seconds)
Documents citing Poovappa Bangera And Ors. vs The Land Tribunal And Ors. on 20 August, 2004

Smt.Leelavathi.P.Mahale vs Sri.Hanumanthappa Siddlingappanavar on 2 January, 2021

33. At this stage learned counsel for petitioner relied on decision reported in Poovappa Bangera and Others Vs The Land Tribunal, Belthangady and Others in ILR 2004 KAR 4786, Dahiben Vs. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (Gajra) (D) The Lrs and Others reported in 2020 SCC Online SC 562 (para 18) ­ "As per the Plaintiffs, the Sale Deed was executed on 02.07.2009 in favour of Respondent No.1, which was registered before the Office of the Sub­Registrar, for which the plaintiffs would have remained personally present. The transaction having been executed through a registered document, was in the public domain, and in the knowledge of the plaintiffs right from the beginning."
Bangalore District Court Cites 76 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Mahadevappa vs State Of Karnataka on 7 February, 2023

(b) Under normal circumstances, the concept of mortgage and the lease are different, is true. However, when the dictionary clause of the statute gives a different meaning, that meaning has to be adopted. This view gains support from the decision of a Coordinate Bench of this Court in POOVAPPA BANGERA AND OTEHRS vs. THE LAND TRIBUNAL, BELTHANGADY AND OTHERS, ILR 2004 KAR 4782. This having not been rightly appreciated by the -7- WP No. 35199 of 2012 tribunal, there is a error apparent on the face of the record warranting interference of the Writ Court.
Karnataka High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - K S Dixit - Full Document
1