Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.79 seconds)
Documents citing V.Madhusudhan Rao And 7 Others vs S.Nirmala Bai And 4 Others on 6 March, 2019

Smt. Kandala Pulamma vs Chennu Vijaya Venkata Lakshmana Kumar on 18 July, 2025

and others 1, (ii) State of Haryana and Ors Vs. Navir Singh and Another 2, (iii) Yellapu Uma Maheswari & Anr Vs. Budda Jagadheeswararao & Ors 3, (iv) Golla Dharmanna Vs. Sakari Poshetty and Others 4, (v) Satti Venkateswara Reddy Vs. Mallidi Venkata Reddy 5 and (vi) V.Madhusudhan Rao and 7 Others Vs. S.Nirmala Bai and 4 Others. 6 Prayed to allow the appeal by set aside the judgment and decree in O.S.No.2 of 2014, dated 07.02.2020, passed by the learned II Additional District Judge, Nalgonda at Suryapet.
Telangana High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Prakash Construction vs Allahabad on 5 December, 2025

4.5 I find that the agreement is neither notarized nor bears date of execution. It has no meaning in the eyes of law. Further, the balance sheet submitted by the appellant is also undated. The signature of the appellant on both the balance sheet and agreement differs which casts a doubt on the authenticity on the documents submitted by the appellant. Sec. 35 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 directs that no instrument chargeable with duty shall be admitted in evidence for any purpose by any person having by law or consent of parties authority to receive evidence, or shall be acted upon, registered or authenticated by any such Service Tax Appeal No.70720 of 2025 5 person or by any public officer, unless such instrument is duly stamped cited in V.Madhusudhan Rao v. S. Nirmala Bai, AIR 2019 AP 93.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kananeboina Kamala vs Harish Prathap Reddy on 18 February, 2020

8. I am in complete agreement with the view taken by the trial Court supported by the principle laid down by a learned single Judge of High Court of Andhra Pradesh in MADHUSUDHAN RAO's case (supra 3). The issue need not detain any further having regard to the principle laid down by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in the said judgment. Paragraph Nos.15 and 17 of the said judgment read as under:
Telangana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - P N Rao - Full Document

Smt. Enabothula Vanamala vs Junnuthula Subha on 7 June, 2023

4. Both the parties have submitted their respective arguments in support of their claims. The defendants relied on Judgments reported in 'Smt.Kamala Devi and others vs. Y.Anthi 3 SSRN,J C.R.P. No.1882 of 2021 Reddy and others'1, 'Y.Vijayalakshmi and others vs. Ashish Agarwal and others'2, 'Avinash Kumar Chauhan vs. Vijay Krishna Mishra'3, 'M.Manjula and others vs. Gajam Chandraiah (Died) and others'4, whereas, the plaintiffs relied on Judgments reported in 'K.B.Saha and Sons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Development consultant Ltd.,'5, V.Madhusudhan Rao and others vs. S.Nirmala Bai and others'6, 'Anga Bhuloka Rao vs. Noorjahan Begum'7, 'Sakalabhaktula Lalitha and another vs. Nandana Ranga Rao (Died) and others'8, 'Ranga Reddy vs. Sadhu Padamma and others'9, 'Banguru Ramathulasamma vs. Yedem Masthan Reddy and others'10, 'Neerukonda Hanumantha Rao vs. Puthumbaka Narayanaprasad and others'11, 'S.Ravinder Reddy and another vs. State of Telangana rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Hyderabad and others'12.
Telangana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pathapati Yanadi Reddy vs Nukalapati Subbamma on 22 October, 2024

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner relying on the decision of the Apex Court in the case Balram Singh Vs. Kelo Devi1, and the decision of this Court in the case of V. Madhusudhan Rao & Ors. Vs. S. Nirmala Bai & Ors2., contends that the suit filed for permanent injunction, without seeking for specific relief of execution of the sale deed, the suit for injunction on the basis of an unregistered agreement of sale is not maintainable and so also the said unregistered agreement cannot be exhibited in evidence. The contention of the defendant as stated in the written statement is as under:-
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1