Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.68 seconds)

Subodh Jain vs Subhash Chand Jain & Ors. on 19 July, 2018

19. The judgment relied upon by the Plaintiff i.e., Rama Devi v. Mahender Pal 2016 (2) CCC 585 (Uttara.), to submit that a family arrangement is binding on the parties and operates as an estoppel. This proposition, in fact, is against the Plaintiff, because the initial family CS (OS) 2582/2014 Page 20 of 21 arrangement dated 26th March, 1991 and the subsequent family settlement is binding on all the parties including the Plaintiff, who accepted it unconditionally.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - P M Singh - Full Document

Mahendra Prasad vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 2 August, 2024

The present application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to quash a writ of demand issued by the Tehsildar Ghatamapur, Kanpur Nagar, in R.C. Form No. 36, dated 20.6.2024 in compliance of order dated 15.12.2023 and 12.3.2024 passed in Maintenance Case No. 1193 of 2023 (Smt Rama Dvi vs. Mahendra Prasad), under Section 125(3) of Cr.P.C. by Principal Judge, Family Court, Kanpur Dehat, whereby recovery warrant has been issued against the applicant.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S K Pachori - Full Document
1