1/5 State vs . Sukhraj on 11 March, 2013
5/5 State Vs. Sukhraj
to do, commits "criminal breach of trust".
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.30 seconds)Amarbir Singh And Ors. vs State Of Punjab And Ors. on 7 July, 2003
To substantiate this, Shri Dwivedi referred to the charts produced during the course of arguments. In the end, Shri Dwivedi argued that even if reference made to Rule 23 of the 1976 Rules in orders dated 23.5.2002 is considered inappropriate, the Court may not nullify the decision of the government keeping in view the fact that the entire process of selection has been proved to be taineted by unfairness, manipulations and corruption. He submitted that the government possess inherent power to cancel such type of selections. Shri Dwivedi supported his arguments by placing reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Tarun Kumar Sinha, A.I.R. 2001 S.C. 2196; B. Ramjini and Ors. v. State of Andhra Pradesh, A.I.R. 2002 S.C. 2023; Municipal Corporation, Raipur v. Ashok Kumar Mishra, (1991)3 S.C.C. 325; Afjal Ullah v. State of Utar Pradesh, 1964(4) S.C.R. 991; Titaghar Paper Mills v. Orissa State Electricity Board and Anr., (1975)2 S.C.C. 436; State of Sikkim v. Dorgee Tshering Bhutia and Ors., (1991)4 S.C.C. 243; Union of India v. Tulsiram Patel, (1985)3 S.C.C. 398; and State of Punjab v. Sukhraj Bahadur, 1998(3) S.L.R. 234.
1