Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.51 seconds)

Royal Infrastructure vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax ... on 29 April, 2019

19. This court in the case of Cliantha Research Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income­tax,[2014] 225 Taxman 102 (Gujarat), was dealing with a case where the assessee had made a claim for deduction under section 80IB(8A) of the Act which was Page 21 of 24 Downloaded on : Sun Jun 30 12:44:00 IST 2019 C/SCA/20078/2018 JUDGMENT thoroughly examined by the Assessing Officer during the course of scrutiny assessment wherein the Assessing Officer had raised various queries which were replied by the assessee. He, however, did not raise any specific query as regards the allowability of the claim on the premise that the petitioner was doing scientific research for and on behalf of companies. The court held that merely for failure of the Assessing Officer to raise such question would not authorise him to reopen the assessment even within a period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year as any such attempt on his part would be based on mere change of opinion. The court held that when a claim was processed at length after calling for detailed explanation from the assessee, and the same was accepted, merely because a certain element or angle was not in the mind of the Assessing Officer while accepting such a claim, cannot be a ground for issuing notice for reassessment. This decision would be squarely applicable to the facts of the present case. In this case also, during the course of scrutiny assessment, the Assessing Officer examined the claim for deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Act in detail and raised several queries and after processing such claim accepted the same. He, however, failed to examine the claim in the context of clauses (e) Page 22 of 24 Downloaded on : Sun Jun 30 12:44:00 IST 2019 C/SCA/20078/2018 JUDGMENT and (f) thereof. Thus, merely because while examining the claim under section 80IB(10) of the Act, a certain angle was not in the mind of the Assessing Officer would not be a good ground for reopening the assessment as the same would amount to a mere change of opinion.
Gujarat High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - H Devani - Full Document
1