Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 110 (0.62 seconds)
Documents citing New Shorrock Mills vs Maheshbhai T. Rao on 25 October, 1996

M/S. Empire Dyeing vs Vasudev S. Kusam & Ors on 10 October, 2017

39. Learned counsel for the said employees distinguished the judgment of the Supreme Court in case of New Shorrock Mills (supra) on the ground that there was no issue before the Supreme Court in that judgment that the punishment awarded by the employer was outside the purview of the Standing Orders. She submits that none of the provisions of the Standing Orders provide for lesser punishment than the punishment specifically enumerated in the Standing Order 24.
Bombay High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - R D Dhanuka - Full Document

South Indian Bank Ltd. vs V.G. Krishnakumar And Anr. on 16 November, 2005

As such the jurisdictional limits of the Labour Court as also that of the High Court in exercise of jurisdiction conferred on them under Section 11-A of the I.D. Act and Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been well defined by the principles laid down by the Supreme Court. What is left for us is only to apply the principles to the facts of the present case.
Kerala High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 5 - S Jagan - Full Document

G. Rushikeshwara Rao vs Vazir Sultan Tobacco Industries Ltd., ... on 3 October, 2001

In NEW SHORROCK MILLS v. MAHESHBHAI T. RAO, , the Labour Court despite recording a finding that the departmental enquiry held against the workman was legal and proper and that the order of discharge was not by way of victimisation, set aside the punishment of discharge and substituted the same with an order of reinstatement. In that connection, the Apex Court observed:
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Maharashtra State Road Transport ... vs Ramesh Narayan Sanap And Anr. on 13 September, 2005

In between New Shorrock Mills v. Maheshbhai T. Rao, the Hon'ble Apex Court has considered the case of a workman who was only a Badli workman and he was found guilty of abusing Deputy Manager and threatening that mill officers would not be safe outside the mill and he might murder some of them. This misconduct was preceded by other misconducts/punishments in the past and though workman was given chances to improve, he did not improve. It is in this background that the Hon'ble Apex Court held that punishment of dismissal for such workman was not shockingly disproportionate.
Bombay High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next