citedby: 10882024

1 - 10 of 10 (0.35 seconds)

Documents citing Mahendra Sponge &Amp Power Ltd vs Principal Commissioner Customs, ... on 29 August, 2022

Hero Motor Corp Ltd vs Delhi-Iii on 6 June, 2024

9 E/59431/2013 & 13 others  Palmtech Institutions India (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Jaipur, [2015] 38 STR 54  Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. HCL Technologies, [2015] 37 STR 716  Manhattan Associates (India) Development Centre (P.)

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 71 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rashmi Cement Ltd vs Howrah Commissionerate on 18 June, 2025

Appeal No(s).: E/75629-75631,75810,75812-75814, 75844/2019-DB 10.3. We further take note of the fact that the issue has also been examined by this Tribunal in the case of Apple Sponge and Power Ltd. (supra) wherein, again, this Tribunal observed as under: -

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Maa Shakumbari Sponge Pvt Ltd vs Howrah Commissionerate on 18 June, 2025

Appeal No(s).: E/75629-75631,75810,75812-75814, 75844/2019-DB 10.3. We further take note of the fact that the issue has also been examined by this Tribunal in the case of Apple Sponge and Power Ltd. (supra) wherein, again, this Tribunal observed as under: -

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Swastik Ispat Pvt Ltd vs Howrah Commissionerate on 18 June, 2025

Appeal No(s).: E/75629-75631,75810,75812-75814, 75844/2019-DB 10.3. We further take note of the fact that the issue has also been examined by this Tribunal in the case of Apple Sponge and Power Ltd. (supra) wherein, again, this Tribunal observed as under: -

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rashmi Metaliks Ltd vs Howrah Commissionerate on 18 June, 2025

Appeal No(s).: E/75629-75631,75810,75812-75814, 75844/2019-DB 10.3. We further take note of the fact that the issue has also been examined by this Tribunal in the case of Apple Sponge and Power Ltd. (supra) wherein, again, this Tribunal observed as under: -

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rashmi Metaliks Ltd vs Howrah Commissionerate on 18 June, 2025

Appeal No(s).: E/75629-75631,75810,75812-75814, 75844/2019-DB 10.3. We further take note of the fact that the issue has also been examined by this Tribunal in the case of Apple Sponge and Power Ltd. (supra) wherein, again, this Tribunal observed as under: -

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Seven Star Steels Ltd vs Howrah Commissionerate on 18 June, 2025

Appeal No(s).: E/75629-75631,75810,75812-75814, 75844/2019-DB 10.3. We further take note of the fact that the issue has also been examined by this Tribunal in the case of Apple Sponge and Power Ltd. (supra) wherein, again, this Tribunal observed as under: -

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mahakali Ispat Pvt Ltd vs Howrah Commissionerate on 18 June, 2025

Appeal No(s).: E/75629-75631,75810,75812-75814, 75844/2019-DB 10.3. We further take note of the fact that the issue has also been examined by this Tribunal in the case of Apple Sponge and Power Ltd. (supra) wherein, again, this Tribunal observed as under: -

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vishal Metallics Pvt Ltd vs Howrah Commissionerate on 18 June, 2025

Appeal No(s).: E/75629-75631,75810,75812-75814, 75844/2019-DB 10.3. We further take note of the fact that the issue has also been examined by this Tribunal in the case of Apple Sponge and Power Ltd. (supra) wherein, again, this Tribunal observed as under: -

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mitsui Prime Advanced Composites India ... vs Commissioner, Central Excise & ... on 20 January, 2026

The Ahmedabad Bench in Commissioner of Service Tax versus Kiri Dyes and Chemicals Ltd.7 and also in the case of Adani Power Mundra Limited versus Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax8 upheld the view that 'Ocean Freight' is not liable to service tax and hence no liability 4 (2024) 25 Centax 311 (Del.) 5 2025 (391) ELT 468 (Bom.) 6 (2023) 7 CENTAX 63 (Mad) 7 (2023) 10 Centax 134 (Tri.-Ahmd) 8 Final Order No. 12764/2024 5 can be fastened on the appellant. The decision in the case of Commissioner of Service Tax Versus Kiri Dyes and Chemicals Ltd.9 was challenged by the Revenue before the Supreme Court10, however, the same has been dismissed, upholding the decision of the Tribunal.

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

1