Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.32 seconds)
Documents citing Rajendra Karbhari Kale vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 23 January, 2017

Pintu @ Ramesh S/O. Uttamrao Gapat vs The State Of Maharashtra on 25 July, 2017

In support of his aforesaid contentions, he pressed into sevice exposition of law in the cases of Bilal Gulam Rasul Patel v. Divisional Magistrate, Thane and others1, Salauddin s/o. Akramuddin v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.2, Rajendra Karbhari Kale v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.3 and Kanifnath Radhakishan Popalghat v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.4 Therefore, he submits that the Petition may be allowed. 1 2014 ALL.M.R. [Cri.] 2161 2 2014 ALL.M.R. [Cri.] 993 3 2017 ALL M.R. [Cri.] 824 4 2017 ALL.M.R. [Cri.]
Bombay High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - S S Shinde - Full Document

Vikrant S/O. Prabhakar Nawle vs The Divisional Commissioner Nashik ... on 21 August, 2017

3481, Yeshwant Damodar Patil vs Hemant Karkare, Dy.Commissioner of Police, 1989(3) BCR 240 and Kanifnath Radhakishan Popalghat Vs. The State of Maharashtra 2017 ALL MR (Cri) 795 Division Bench judgment of this Court to which one of us ( Justice S.S. Shinde ) was a party, Rajendra Karbhari Kale Vs. The State of Maharashtra, 2017 ALL MR (Cri) 824, Division Bench judgment of this Court to which one of us (Justice S.S. Shinde) was a member the subjective satisfaction of the competent authority that the witnesses were afraid to come forward in public and give evidence against the externment is a sine qua non. It is not recorded.
Bombay High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - A M Dhavale - Full Document

Yogesh Ashok Deshmukh And Anr vs Nilima Nandu Mhatre And Ors on 22 January, 2026

12. As a second limb of the submission, Mr. Patil would urge that, in the meeting of panchayat held on 18 th March, 2024, the Respondent No. 1 had categorically disputed the resignation and disowned the same. In this view of the matter, the Divisional Commissioner was justified in returning a finding that, there was no lawful resignation and, in any event, the same stood withdrawn. To lend support to this submission, the learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 placed reliance on the decisions of this Court in the cases of Mina Kalyan Devdhe Vs. SAINATH 10/29 ::: Uploaded on - 23/01/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 23/01/2026 23:12:54 ::: WP 12689-2025.DOC Commissioner, Nashik Division & Ors.1, Sudhakar Yashwant Warule Vs. Gramsevak & Ors.2, and Kalavati Rajendra Kokale Vs. State of Maharashtra3.
Bombay High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - N J Jamadar - Full Document
1