Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (2.47 seconds)
Documents citing Sutapa Chatterjee And Another vs Uco Bank And Others on 12 March, 2013

Sree Jeya Soundharam Textile Mills Pvt. ... vs Canara Bank

10.In an unreported judgment rendered in case of Sutapa Chatterjee & another v. UCO Bank & Rs; reported in http://www.judis.nic.in 43 (C.O.4051 of 2012) decided on March 12, 2013, the Co-ordinate Bench took note of the description in the first column embodied in Rule 8(2) of the Appellate Tribunal Procedural Rules and held that since no amount of debt is adjudicated to be due from a person appealing against an interlocutory order of the Tribunal, the fees prescribed in Rule 8(2) is not applicable in the followings:
Madras High Court Cites 56 - Cited by 0 - M Duraiswamy - Full Document

Gade Sreenivas Reddy vs The State Bank Of India on 28 August, 2025

A similar question fell before a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court, the Allahabad High Court and the Calcutta High Court in State Bank of India Vs. Doon Valley Rice Mills Ltd. 4, Jai Gopal Kansal Vs. Indian Bank 5, and Sutapa Chatterjee Vs. UCO Bank 6; respectively. The Courts made a distinction between an appeal arising out of determination of debt and a miscellaneous appeal where the latter would not come within the condition of section 21 of the RDB Act. Conclusion
Telangana High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1