Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.34 seconds)

Tallam Banu S/O. Tallam Ramaswamy vs J Gopinath S/O. Achaiah Shetty on 28 July, 2017

In B.K.S.Marulasiddaiah and Company Vs. Madras Pakku Mandy (2015(1) Scale 685), originally a suit for recovery of money, which ultimately went to the Hon'ble Apex Court, the Hon'ble Apex Court was pleased to observe that, prior sanction as required under Section 84(4) of the APMC Act, was applied for and obtained after a period of about 11 years from date of cause of action and that the plaintiff had not even applied for such sanction from the Market Committee at the time of filing of the suit. Further, the suit was delayed by a period of about 11 years and as such, barred by limitation. With this, the civil appeal was allowed and the judgment and order under appeal was set aside.
Karnataka High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Union Of India Through Assistant ... vs Mansukh Shah Huf on 18 December, 2023

A reference is made to the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in paragraph 5 onwards in the decision in the case of B.K.S. Marulasiddaiah and Company v. Madras Pakku Mandy reported in (2015) 15 SCC 740. Yet, few other decisions have also been pointed out by learned senior advocate Mr. Nanavati to oppose the application for condonation of delay which judgments are:
Gujarat High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - A J Shastri - Full Document
1