Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.49 seconds)
Documents citing Chinmaya Sahu vs State Of Orissa ... Opposite Party on 20 July, 2023

Dayaram S/O Bhajan Lal vs State Of Rajasthan on 30 August, 2024

In this regard, learned counsel representing the petitioner had placed reliance upon the ratio encapsulated Chinmaya Sahu vs. State of Orissa in CRLMC No. 2452/2023, and Parvinder Singh Khurana vs. Directorate of Enforcement in Criminal Appeal Nos. 3059-3062/2024. Lastly, learned counsel had averred that if deemed appropriate additional conditions may be imposed upon the petitioner and the instant petition be allowed.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - S Jain - Full Document

Bhushan Ray vs The State Of Bihar on 4 May, 2026

33. It would be also profitable to refer to Chinmaya Sahu Vs. State of Orissa, as decided by Orissa High Court and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82908 of 2025 dt.04-05-2026 16/33 reported in 2023 SCC OnLine Ori 5121. Here, the accused Petitioner was granted bail by the Court of Judicial Magistrate in a case relating to bailable offence. However, in course of investigation, other offences were found to have been committed by the accused Petitioner punishable under Section 420, 465, 467, 471, 409 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Consequently, the Investigating Officer of the case made prayer before learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of the bail bond of the accused Petitioner. Accordingly, the bail bond of the Petitioner was cancelled by the Court. This order of the cancellation was challenged before the High Court under Section 482 Cr.PC submitting that the bail was granted to him under Section 436 Cr.PC by the Court of Judicial Magistrate, and hence, the power of cancellation granted to the Magistrate under Section 437(5) of Cr.PC was not available to learned Judicial Magistrate. The bail order could have been cancelled only under Section 439(2) of Cr.PC by the Court of Sessions or by the High Court. It was also submitted by the Petitioner that the bail order was cancelled without giving opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner violating the principle of natural justice
Patna High Court Cites 64 - Cited by 0 - J Kumar - Full Document

Munna Paswan vs The State Of Bihar on 4 May, 2026

29. It would be also profitable to refer to Chinmaya Sahu Vs. State of Orissa, as decided by Orissa High Court and reported in 2023 SCC OnLine Ori 5121. Here, the accused Petitioner was granted bail by the Court of Judicial Magistrate in a case relating to bailable offence. However, in course of investigation, other offences were found to have been committed by the accused Petitioner punishable under Section 420, 465, 467, 471, 409 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Consequently, the Investigating Officer of the case made prayer before learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of the bail bond of the accused Petitioner. Accordingly, the bail bond of the Petitioner was cancelled by the Court. This order of the cancellation was challenged before the High Court under Section 482 Cr.PC submitting that the bail was granted to him under Section 436 Cr.PC by the Court of Judicial Magistrate, and hence, the power of cancellation granted to the Magistrate under Section 437(5) of Cr.PC was not available to learned Judicial Magistrate. The bail order could have been cancelled only under Section 439(2) of Cr.PC by the Court of Sessions or Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16411 of 2026 dt. 04-05-2026 15/31 by the High Court. It was also submitted by the Petitioner that the bail order was cancelled without giving opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner violating the principle of natural justice
Patna High Court Cites 57 - Cited by 0 - J Kumar - Full Document

Mr. Manoj @ Manoj Kumar vs The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police on 6 April, 2026

4. The learned counsel also relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in 2022 Live Law (SC) 956 (Bhuri Bai Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh) and the judgment of the Orissa High Court in 2024 (1) AICLR 1049 (Chinmaya Sahu Vs. State of Orissa) and the order of the learned Single Judge in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.21338 of 2018 dated 22.02.2019 (The State through the Inspector of Police, Keeramangalam Police Station, Pudukottai District Vs. Selvaraj and others).
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1