Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.48 seconds)
Documents citing M/S Dharamvir And Company vs Delhi Development Authority on 7 July, 2022

M/S Dharamvir And Company vs Delhi Development Authority on 9 February, 2023

Announced in open court Digitally signed on 9th February, 2023. RUCHIKA by RUCHIKA SINGLA SINGLA Date: 2023.02.09 16:14:02 +0530 (RUCHIKA SINGLA) Addl. Distt. Judge-03, North-West Distt., Rohini Courts, Delhi. This judgment contains 14 pages and each page is checked and signed by me. Arb. no. 850/17 Dharamvir & Co. vs. Delhi Development Authority Page no. 14 of 14
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dharamvir vs Delhi Development Authority on 23 November, 2023

17. Regarding the claim no. 2, as mentioned above, the plaintiff has sought damages due to prolongation of the contract. As averred by him, he had to pay wages/ salary to his staff for the additional period which was incurred in the completion of the contract. Again no evidence has been led by the plaintiff in this regard before the Ld. Trial Court. As mentioned earlier, only certain communication which was exchanged between the parties was proved on record. The plaintiff did not prove on record any such document vide which he can show that he had paid any wages/salary to his staff which was allegedly deployed at the site when the site was not in a working condition. The plaintiff has also not placed on record any TDS certificate or his balance sheet or his profit/ loss statement or any such statement as per which it can be proved on record that he had paid the said wages. Hence, in the opinion of the court, there is no RCA DJ no. 17/19 DHARAMVIR VS. DDA and RCA DJ no. 24/19 DDA Vs. DHARAMVIR Page 10 of 10 error or infirmity in the judgment of the Ld. Trial Court in respect to this claim.
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Delhi Development Authority vs Dharamvir on 23 November, 2023

17. Regarding the claim no. 2, as mentioned above, the plaintiff has sought damages due to prolongation of the contract. As averred by him, he had to pay wages/ salary to his staff for the additional period which was incurred in the completion of the contract. Again no evidence has been led by the plaintiff in this regard before the Ld. Trial Court. As mentioned earlier, only certain communication which was exchanged between the parties was proved on record. The plaintiff did not prove on record any such document vide which he can show that he had paid any wages/salary to his staff which was allegedly deployed at the site when the site was not in a working condition. The plaintiff has also not placed on record any TDS certificate or his balance sheet or his profit/ loss statement or any such statement as per which it can be proved on record that he had paid the said wages. Hence, in the opinion of the court, there is no RCA DJ no. 17/19 DHARAMVIR VS. DDA and RCA DJ no. 24/19 DDA Vs. DHARAMVIR Page 10 of 10 error or infirmity in the judgment of the Ld. Trial Court in respect to this claim.
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1