Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 75 (1.56 seconds)
Documents citing Kalla @ Kalyan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 25 February, 2015

Kalla vs The State Of M.P. on 23 July, 2020

The prosecution story in short is that on 22.08.2019, the HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT GWALIOR M.Cr.C. No.20716/2020 ( Kalla Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh ) (2) complainant lodged missing person report in respect of his daughter (prosecutrix) aged about 17 years to the effect that she had gone to answer the nature's call but did not return. The girl, who accompanied the prosecutrix, informed the complainant that she has been taken away by the person who came on white coloured vehicle. It is also alleged that the applicant took the prosecutrix alongwith him on the pretext of marriage and committed rape from the date of incident till 22.10.2019. On the basis of aforesaid, the crime has been registered against the present applicant.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S A Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Kalla @ Kalyan vs State Of M.P. on 25 August, 2020

It is made clear that benefit of suspension shall be extended to the appellants No.1 Kalla @ Kalyan, No.6 Brajmohan and No.7 Ramkesh only on depositing an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) each in Prime Minister Citizen Assistance and relief in Emergency Situation Fund (PM Cares Fund). They shall submit an attested photocopy of the receipt before the concerning HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT GWALIOR Cr.A.No.3116/2020 ( Kalla @ Kalyan and others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ) (4) Court, for placing the same on record of this case. They shall also furnish a written undertaking that they will abide by the terms and conditions of various circulars, as well as, orders issued by the Central Government, State Government and local administration from time to time such as maintaining social distancing, physical distancing, hygiene etc. to avoid proliferation of Corona virus. They shall install Arogya Setu App.(If not already installed) in the mobile phone.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S A Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Kalla @ Kalyan vs State Of M.P. on 13 August, 2020

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that appellants No. HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT GWALIOR Cr.A. 3116/2020 ( Kalla @ Kalyan & Ors. Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh ) (2) 4 (Ramprasad) & 5 (Chironjilal) have been falsely convicted in the matter. It is further submitted that there are omissions and contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution witnesses. It is further submitted that prosecution has not examined any independent witness, but only interested witnesses and relatives of the complainant have been examined. It is further submitted that in view of outbreak of COVID 19, detention of the appellants No. 4 (Ramprasad) & 5 (Chironjilal) in already congested prison may be detrimental. It is further submitted that there is no allegation against the appellants No. 4 (Ramprasad) & 5 (Chironjilal) for assaulting the victim. The only allegation levelled against the appellants No. 4 (Ramprasad) & 5 (Chironjilal) is that the appellants No. 4 & 5 have also participated in the offence alleged along with more than five accused persons, but the prosecution has not added section 149 of IPC along with offence charged against the appellants No. 4 & 5, therefore, no case is made out against the appellants No. 4 & 5. There are fair chances of success of this appeal and the appeal may take long time for its conclusion and the appellants No. 4 (Ramprasad) & 5 (Chironjilal) cannot be kept in custody for an unlimited period. Under these circumstances, the execution of sentence be suspended and they be released on bail.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S A Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Kalla vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 November, 2021

Accordingly, the application filed by the applicant is allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.70,000/- (Rs.Seventy thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his regular appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that he shall remain present before the Court concerned during trial and 3 M.Cr.C.No.45983/2021 (Kalla Vs. State of M.P.) shall also abide by the conditions enumerated under Section 437(3) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - A Verma - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next